Yuan
Pages at www.miracleu.org
_page0022 | updated 3 Aug 2021, by
Rene Helmerichs
A) Yuan Pages; B) Base Argument
A)
Yuan Pages
Motions and Appeals to any part of the
Judicial Yuan, generally excludes civil lawsuits (TLAW Page 18) and
Procuratorate (TPRO Page 12) filings
08.
Local Tainan court Criminal retrial (grounds in
motions 4 and 6)
07.
High court Civil retrial
motion
06.
Motion contains missing statements
from court hearing record of 13 July 2021
聲請包含民國110年7月13日法庭聽證記錄中遺漏的陳述
yuan0006_20210803.pdf: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1qyEkFhd-iLnfZsV73ZorWzW9GT01tv_o/view?usp=sharing
CC
Web: http://reneguru.blogspot.com/2021/08/yuan0006.html
05.
Motion to verify missing statements
from court hearing record of 13 and 28 July 2021
聲請核實110年7月13日至28日法庭聽證記錄中遺漏的陳述
(This
is specifically the ability to get around the 7-day limit on adding missing
statements because the court didn't provide a translation of the Chinese
hearing statements. I can't know what's
missing until I know what's there.)
yuan0005_20210730.pdf:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1rwpuErjKmVzTVsh9Avz3xEEoCpVM3_ky/view?usp=sharing
CC Web: http://reneguru.blogspot.com/2021/07/yuan0005.html
04.
Taiwan Criminal Procedure Code Article
18 Motion to disqualify Judges
《刑事訴訟法》第18條聲請法官迴避
yuan0004_20210730.pdf:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1sNRgZZ98vzH57yvwy2jO-Qu3lJGSIZi0/view?usp=sharing
CC
Web: http://reneguru.blogspot.com/2021/07/yuan0004.html
03.
Make a tracking page to track the 16
July 2021 criminal investigation request.
Follow this one up.
cnpc0001_20210716.pdf:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1GWXxfYdff2OyLngU3TETubjHxH4kzRK3/view?usp=sharing
CC
Web: http://reneguru.blogspot.com/2021/07/cnpc0001.html
If
I don't get results from the investigation, I can do it again as a spin-off
from motion number 6, in future courtroom hearings.
02.
The purpose is to pursue the doctors
about a mental assessment. I'm not
saying I'm ill. I'm saying that they
don't have a right to refuse me an assessment.
Note to self: submit CRCT0023 to court as
YUAN0002, coming at the 16 July 2021 investigation request from the angle of
having a lawful right to mental health (and therein a mental assessment to
determine what "medications" they would think I need to achieve
health). Include the emails from 23 and
25 Jan 2018 evidencing believe of illness.
This is my note, while planning what
to number the 30 July 2021 motions: "2: 13 July 2021 in court (31 may
transcript, 5 aug 2015 trans, 9 july 2021 email 20 may 2017 audio
recording)"
So, I'm telling myself to follow up,
or embed:
The 13 July 2021 court hearing I'm
pursuing in numbers 5 and 6.
The court received the 31 May 2021 recorded
conversation with Jainan
Psychiatric Center
(衛生福利部嘉南療養院) Forensic Psychiatrist (司法精神醫師) Chun-Hung Lee (李俊宏) in 23 pages submitted during the
court hearing on 13 July 2021. The
hearing record (Chinese-only) is in motions 4, 5, and 6.
The 5 Aug 2015 transcript made its way
into ...
The
5 Aug 2015 note will also come up in Scott's lawsuit at http://reneguru.blogspot.com/2021/07/tlaw0002.html
and
in the retrial motion of the current criminal proceedings, motion 8
It
was used in Criminal Court on 13 July 2021, originally submitted in the book
The Choice on 25 Sept 2019.
The 9 July
2021 email is on the web at: http://reneguru.blogspot.com/2021/07/klss0013.html
9 July 2021 PDF (submitted in Criminal Court
on 13 July 2021) is in the Old Pages folder under KLSS0013: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/12TqH4UtpFf813Kt6X_jv9_9pjTsnf5Fu?usp=sharing
The 20 May 2021 audio recording...
Criminal
Court heard the recording on 13 July 2021.
It
was played in Civil Court
the year before that.
Also
submitted on 29 April 2020 to Criminal Court, 10 April 2020 Civil Court, and in
2019 to the Prosecutors again in the Civil lawsuit (filed but not paid) against
Judge Luo.
Recently
to the prosecutors on 23 July 2021.
tpro0001_20210723.pdf:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1vb59TuptmoRxA4B9gXIfGLQ_Ht3dtMox/view?usp=sharing
01.
Chang Jung
Christian University (長榮大學) Department Of Translation Studies (翻譯學系) insisted on submitting a false translation to Criminal Court. The statement is the only evidence
prosecutors have to support the cram school's allegation of extortion. Sounds ridiculous, but it happened, and Professor Sally
Wu (吳宜錚) knew it was false... she
actually provided two different translations to the same court file. Then she claimed that I didn't provide her
with enough context, which is laughable since I'm the author of the original
statement.
No page exists to track this one
through Criminal court about the extortion allegation BUT the same PDF document
was submitted to Prosecutors AND it also became a Civil Lawsuit AFTER the
university insisted to keep the false translation. If the Civil Court doesn't grant me the victory,
I'll go after the judges.
Prosecutors,
Page 12: http://reneguru.blogspot.com/2021/06/tpro0002.html
Lawsuit,
Page 18: http://reneguru.blogspot.com/2021/07/tlaw0001.html
PDF:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1TOmgIvbsQj353eh02k6P1fZavYVCRew5/view?usp=sharing
00.
There are several (multiple) filings
and submissions to several Taiwan
courts before this webpage existed to track them. Of particular importance is the 29 April 2020
Defendant's submission to the Tainan District Criminal Court.
29
April 2020 PDF:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1cWDfuQ1ZgoUFFSIzZh9KJSaBny6YHW70/view?usp=sharing
29
April 2020 accompanying DVD folder:
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1wlDbKCO0t8x-H5dvgLlrFPvrBBdl8bjJ?usp=sharing
There were even more submissions to
Prosecutor offices. In time, maybe the
old stuff will get posted. It's in 7
3-inch binders on a shelf beside me at the moment. At least my wife and I started organizing it
all. Prosecutor filings are kept on Page
12: http://p12.rene.guru
I think I've finally uncovered a filing
system that works for me, a hot web inside the web.
B)
Base Argument
Upholding Freedom Of Religion in China:
www.miracleu.org
Communist China believes "Country
is your God". China owns Taiwan. Taiwan is democratic. Taiwan's Republic Of China
Constitution allows freedom of religious belief. According to Spirit, thinking cannot
originate in a body. That means a brain
scan cannot determine mental health. Yet
Taiwan
judges claim court-ordered assessments of mental health require assessment of
physical health. Do we have the right to
believe in Spirit or not? Watch as we
uncover systemic corruption. Share the
news!
"Are you ready yet to help me
save the world?" (ACIM C-2.9.)
====
#rene.guru
End
of Page. Comment below http://p1.rene.guru
Freedom of Religion in China
(Spirit is One in court)
www.miracleu.org
