Page 22. Share my unwillingness to accept error. (T-1.III.1.)

Yuan Pages at www.miracleu.org

_page0022 | updated 3 Aug 2021, by Rene Helmerichs

A) Yuan Pages; B) Base Argument

 

 A) Yuan Pages

Motions and Appeals to any part of the Judicial Yuan, generally excludes civil lawsuits (TLAW Page 18) and Procuratorate (TPRO Page 12) filings

08.

Local Tainan court Criminal retrial (grounds in motions 4 and 6)

07.

High court Civil retrial motion

06.

Motion contains missing statements from court hearing record of 13 July 2021

聲請包含民國110年7月13日法庭聽證記錄中遺漏的陳述

yuan0006_20210803.pdf: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1qyEkFhd-iLnfZsV73ZorWzW9GT01tv_o/view?usp=sharing

CC Web: http://reneguru.blogspot.com/2021/08/yuan0006.html

05.

Motion to verify missing statements from court hearing record of 13 and 28 July 2021

聲請核實110年7月13日至28日法庭聽證記錄中遺漏的陳述

(This is specifically the ability to get around the 7-day limit on adding missing statements because the court didn't provide a translation of the Chinese hearing statements.  I can't know what's missing until I know what's there.)

yuan0005_20210730.pdf: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1rwpuErjKmVzTVsh9Avz3xEEoCpVM3_ky/view?usp=sharing

CC Web: http://reneguru.blogspot.com/2021/07/yuan0005.html

04.

Taiwan Criminal Procedure Code Article 18 Motion to disqualify Judges

《刑事訴訟法》第18條聲請法官迴避

yuan0004_20210730.pdf: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1sNRgZZ98vzH57yvwy2jO-Qu3lJGSIZi0/view?usp=sharing

CC Web: http://reneguru.blogspot.com/2021/07/yuan0004.html

03.

Make a tracking page to track the 16 July 2021 criminal investigation request.  Follow this one up.

cnpc0001_20210716.pdf: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1GWXxfYdff2OyLngU3TETubjHxH4kzRK3/view?usp=sharing

CC Web: http://reneguru.blogspot.com/2021/07/cnpc0001.html

If I don't get results from the investigation, I can do it again as a spin-off from motion number 6, in future courtroom hearings.

02.

The purpose is to pursue the doctors about a mental assessment.  I'm not saying I'm ill.  I'm saying that they don't have a right to refuse me an assessment.

Note to self: submit CRCT0023 to court as YUAN0002, coming at the 16 July 2021 investigation request from the angle of having a lawful right to mental health (and therein a mental assessment to determine what "medications" they would think I need to achieve health).  Include the emails from 23 and 25 Jan 2018 evidencing believe of illness.

This is my note, while planning what to number the 30 July 2021 motions: "2: 13 July 2021 in court (31 may transcript, 5 aug 2015 trans, 9 july 2021 email 20 may 2017 audio recording)"

So, I'm telling myself to follow up, or embed:

The 13 July 2021 court hearing I'm pursuing in numbers 5 and 6.

The court received the 31 May 2021 recorded conversation with Jainan Psychiatric Center (衛生福利部嘉南療養院) Forensic Psychiatrist (司法精神醫師) Chun-Hung Lee (李俊宏) in 23 pages submitted during the court hearing on 13 July 2021.  The hearing record (Chinese-only) is in motions 4, 5, and 6.

The 5 Aug 2015 transcript made its way into ...

The 5 Aug 2015 note will also come up in Scott's lawsuit at http://reneguru.blogspot.com/2021/07/tlaw0002.html

and in the retrial motion of the current criminal proceedings, motion 8

It was used in Criminal Court on 13 July 2021, originally submitted in the book The Choice on 25 Sept 2019.

The 9 July 2021 email is on the web at: http://reneguru.blogspot.com/2021/07/klss0013.html

9 July 2021 PDF (submitted in Criminal Court on 13 July 2021) is in the Old Pages folder under KLSS0013: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/12TqH4UtpFf813Kt6X_jv9_9pjTsnf5Fu?usp=sharing

The 20 May 2021 audio recording...

Criminal Court heard the recording on 13 July 2021. 

It was played in Civil Court the year before that. 

Also submitted on 29 April 2020 to Criminal Court, 10 April 2020 Civil Court, and in 2019 to the Prosecutors again in the Civil lawsuit (filed but not paid) against Judge Luo. 

Recently to the prosecutors on 23 July 2021.

tpro0001_20210723.pdf: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1vb59TuptmoRxA4B9gXIfGLQ_Ht3dtMox/view?usp=sharing

01.

Chang Jung Christian University (長榮大學) Department Of Translation Studies (翻譯學系) insisted on submitting a false translation to Criminal Court.  The statement is the only evidence prosecutors have to support the cram school's allegation of extortion.  Sounds ridiculous, but it happened, and Professor Sally Wu (吳宜錚) knew it was false... she actually provided two different translations to the same court file.  Then she claimed that I didn't provide her with enough context, which is laughable since I'm the author of the original statement.

No page exists to track this one through Criminal court about the extortion allegation BUT the same PDF document was submitted to Prosecutors AND it also became a Civil Lawsuit AFTER the university insisted to keep the false translation.  If the Civil Court doesn't grant me the victory, I'll go after the judges.

Prosecutors, Page 12: http://reneguru.blogspot.com/2021/06/tpro0002.html

Lawsuit, Page 18: http://reneguru.blogspot.com/2021/07/tlaw0001.html

PDF: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1TOmgIvbsQj353eh02k6P1fZavYVCRew5/view?usp=sharing

00.

There are several (multiple) filings and submissions to several Taiwan courts before this webpage existed to track them.  Of particular importance is the 29 April 2020 Defendant's submission to the Tainan District Criminal Court. 

29 April 2020 PDF:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1cWDfuQ1ZgoUFFSIzZh9KJSaBny6YHW70/view?usp=sharing

29 April 2020 accompanying DVD folder:

https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1wlDbKCO0t8x-H5dvgLlrFPvrBBdl8bjJ?usp=sharing

There were even more submissions to Prosecutor offices.  In time, maybe the old stuff will get posted.  It's in 7 3-inch binders on a shelf beside me at the moment.  At least my wife and I started organizing it all.  Prosecutor filings are kept on Page 12: http://p12.rene.guru

I think I've finally uncovered a filing system that works for me, a hot web inside the web.

 

B) Base Argument

Upholding Freedom Of Religion in China: www.miracleu.org

Communist China believes "Country is your God".  China owns Taiwan. Taiwan is democratic.  Taiwan's Republic Of China Constitution allows freedom of religious belief.  According to Spirit, thinking cannot originate in a body.  That means a brain scan cannot determine mental health.  Yet Taiwan judges claim court-ordered assessments of mental health require assessment of physical health.  Do we have the right to believe in Spirit or not?  Watch as we uncover systemic corruption.  Share the news!

 

"Are you ready yet to help me save the world?" (ACIM C-2.9.)

====

#rene.guru

End of Page.  Comment below http://p1.rene.guru

Freedom of Religion in China (Spirit is One in court)

www.miracleu.org