TO: Alex
Lee (李泳龍), President (校長)
_cjcu0002 | updated 25 July 2021, by Rene
Helmerichs
Back to
CJCU's List: http://p14.rene.guru
TO: Alex Lee (李泳龍), President (校長),
Reference http://p5.rene.guru to understand the specific
legal reason why
至：台南市長榮大學
AKA: "
電 話：06-2785123
傳 真：06-2785176
地 址：71101台南市歸仁區長大路1號
RE: Criminal PERJURY
關於向台南地方法院提交的故意虛假交易文件：
南院武刑歲108易1170字第1090042211號
All referenced emails
from Sally Wu
(吳宜錚) are in the 25 June 2021 submission to Tainan District Prosecutors
about the perjury:
吳宜錚的所有引用電子郵件都在2021年6月25日提交給台南地區檢察官的關於偽證的提交中：
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1TOmgIvbsQj353eh02k6P1fZavYVCRew5/view?usp=sharing
Hello Mr. Lee, 李泳龍, Alex if I may.
I'm exited to write you.
I intended this to replace the page at
http://p13.rene.guru
But I haven't heard from you.
Allow me to introduce Talk To Dream,
so that you understand its scope.
Nine psychiatrists provided court
documents testifying that I am severely mentally ill:
Schizophrenia,
Delusional Disorder, severe and prolonged psychosis, Schizoaffective Disorder,
Bipolar Disorder, manic and depressive, usually manic, Obsessive-Compulsive
Personality Disorder. They left out fud.
Recently, a tenth psychiatrist joined
our story. There have been ten doctors
in the story, but only 9 psychiatrists who submitted documents in court about
me.
In order of appearance in this story,
the psychiatrists are (
1.
Ali, Liaqat (63312),
2.
Chawla, Anjana (84905),
3.
Lorberg, Gunter Wolfgang (72223),
4.
Van Impe, Jeffrey John Howard (82520),
5.
De Freitas, Karen Denise (71381),
6.
Dickey, Robert Lee (32295),
7.
Komer, William Joseph (55555),
8.
Karagianis, James Leslie (80478),
and
long wrong Wong,
9.
Wong, Leslie Kin Long (86592)
The tenth is Taiwanese, met on 31 May
2021
10.
李俊宏, Lee Chun-Hung
I'll formally welcome him probably
next week at http://p15.rene.guru
Remember, ALL psychiatrists receive
certification approved by the American Psychological Association according to
the teachings of their global bible, The Diagnostic And Statistics Manual,
which is continually revised to keep the public guessing at the source of
mental HEALTH. (We understand that,
BECAUSE Allah exists, the source is NOT a potion or pill).
We're all only ever advertising our
personal beliefs. So why can't we all
work together?
The bible encourages mutual
church-building, right? The part about
"where any two agree, there in their midst is the spirit of
wholeness". Because there is only
one whole, all parts are only learning to work better together. Everyone implicitly serves the same
underlying purpose, sustainability.
Alex, in the email containing the
first draft of this, I forgot to mention, the whole reason everyone of those
psychiatrists is against me is because there's something wrong with me, it's
because I claimed to be the biblical Antichrist, as the cover of the first part
of this story shows:
It's VERY unlikely (emphasis on the
UN) that I'm going to stop believing that about myself. It began like a joke. I figured, if the bible was written to
everyone, then any one of us could stand up and say "Yeah, I'll be that
guy." Well, I guess the joke was on
me. The real question is "Would you
want to be that guy, knowing that the guy in the bible has to give up his
entire personal life in order to establish a new NO-PRIVACY-LAWS city?"
Well, I'm still that guy. And, I definitely deserve A MENTAL
ASSESSMENT. Hence why I'm going after
that 10th doctor PUBLICLY. You guys,
CJCU, Kidsland, and everybody else, you guys are just fluff to help fuel my
fire. Publicity ensures Honesty, and saves all of us time. HELP ME!!
You're either with me, or you're
against me on this one. Let's do this
one in the name of the Spirit Of Christ.
And I do mean "You" as EVERYONE.
On 31 May 2021, in
Find confirmation from court in a document tracking a question about
the doctor, a doctor who denied a severely mentally ill patient the right to a
court-requested mental assessment:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1UB3LevcG-g1wDSdIBKPeRjZO4BZCtmlh/view?usp=sharing
What the doctor did is actually violates Criminal Code Article
294. The law says:
If a person who by law, order, or contract has duty to
support or protect a helpless person abandons him or does not give him support
or protection necessary to preserve his life, the person shall be punished by
imprisonment for not less than six months but not more than five years.
And, on that note, I finally found what I need in order
to begin criminal investigations against prosecutors who refuse to investigate
the three lying cram school managers.
It's Article 125, item 3. The
cram school committed criminal fraud, details at http://p8.rene.guru
Here's my reasoning:
If
our thinking comes from our physical brain THEN a scan of the brain can help
assess problems related to thinking.
BUT
our thinking comes from SPIRIT. Spirit
is eternal, and only momentarily with our body.
It uses the body like a tool, to learn about itself, and make a
"live-action" movie.
THEREFORE
a scan of our physical brain is completely irrelevant to an assessment of
mental health.
Since I am publicly testifying that
GOD is the keeper of mental health (that we are all collectively GOD, not that
God is just one person), therefore, I must correct the mistaken belief in
magic. A "belief in magic" is
exactly what the psychiatrist teaches when the psychiatrist says:
You
need this pill in order to think correctly.
God doesn't exist. Medical
experts put a lot of thought into this pill.
If you eat the pill, you will understand things correctly. This is the right pill. It will help you. And if it doesn't solve inconsistent thinking,
then we'll try a different pill. We'll
find the right one, eventually. I'm
offering you a special discount. Don't
worry, it's not addictive. Just take
this pill until you get better, and remember, you NEED this pill in order to
think correctly.
After that, I started the website at http://rene.guru in order to sort out my thinking,
and share my situation with everyone:
FOR THE LAST SIX MONTHS,
I NEED advertisement TO FIX this. So why would I blackmail anyone?
Unfortunately, cram school managers
also accuse me of being "delusional", so who's going to believe me?
No one believes me.
So I now I'm trying God, again. Your God, Alex. Not mine, since mine is clearly "not
strong enough". Thank you for that,
by the way.
I am calling out: "Holy Spirit,
Our Father In Heaven, Jesus Christ in your name I ask! Please help me to fix the incorrect
translations from a university that claims to serve you and which doesn't seem
to care that a translator is falsely accusing me of crime!"
And, do you know what?
I'm directly asking CJCU to settle
this matter with me before we escalate the issue in court. Consider this message a public notice:
Both Sally Wu (吳宜錚) and Assistant Manager (助理管理師) Kai-Hui Chen (陳凱惠) confirmed submitting
multiple translations beginning in December 2020, over multiple months, to
Tainan District Court file:
南院武刑歲108易1170字第1090042211號
I'm
directly asking
And, because CJCU is supposed to be a
CHRISTIAN school, I'm asking in the name of Jesus Christ, The Holy Spirit, Our
loving Father in Heaven, GOD ALMIGHTY, and all public media outlets
everywhere. Spread the word! Share the news! Forward the link to this page which you are
currently reading:
http://reneguru.blogspot.com/2021/07/cjcu0002.html
Or share the link to the previous
page:
Do we agree the purpose is always to
save the court time, and never to waste it?
The
English statement,
translated by
I wrote the original English statement
in an email to cram school managers dated 16 Oct 2018:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1NVqBbfb3JXVHk89byCUZaPSUWwwU5Jxo/view?usp=sharing
Let's call it Statement 2A.
2a、「nt$250‧buys‧me‧1000‧pieces‧of‧paper‧with‧a‧QR‧code‧and‧pictures‧of‧your‧clients.」
Statement 2A means:
"I
can spend 250nt$ to buy 1000 flyers, since the cost to print 1000 A5-sized black-and-white
copies is only 250nt$ (about 9 USD) in
There
are two A5 flyers on one A4-sized page. The
printing cost of each A4 paper is 0.5nt$.
Flyers can contain any information.
For example, a general picture of a university campus with QR Code
conveniently assisting recipients to find a website containing more detail
about the university's crimes.
Google Translate translates the
meaning of 2A as:
“我可以花250新台幣買1000張傳單，因為在台灣打印1000張A5大小的黑白副本的成本僅為250新台幣（約9美元）。”
在一張A4大小的頁面上有兩張A5傳單。每張A4紙的印刷成本為0.5nt$。傳單可以包含任何信息。例如，帶有QR碼的大學校園全景圖可以方便地幫助接收者找到包含有關大學犯罪的更多詳細信息的網站。
Google doesn't translate Statement 2A
very well because Google Translate expects the "nt$" to come after
the numerical amount, as it would if it were spoken. But in English writing, the dollar sign comes
before the number.
The grammar, however, is correct. My English statement contains zero grammatical flaws. CJCU professor Sally Wu (吳宜錚) also placed the "nt$" in front of the number when she wrote "NT$1,500 for 1,500 English words" in an email dated 22 June 2021 at 3:39 PM.
We can replace "nt$" with
TWD to help Google Translate:
Statement 2A becomes:
7a、TWD250 buys me 1000 pieces of paper with
a QR code and pictures of your clients.
Google translates Statement 2A with
"TWD" instead of "nt$" as:
7b、TWD250給我買了1000張帶有二維碼和客戶照片的紙。
The
first paid translation provided by
5、「（至林義德：）台幣250元跟我買1000張有QR‧code和你客戶的照片。」
Assistant Manager (助理管理師) Kai-Hui Chen (陳凱惠) submitted Statement 5 to the Tainan
District Court in a letter dated 9 Dec 2020 with
https://drive.google.com/file/d/15mE4kznPR0m5JiYkl1zZBq9ai3luodM1/view?usp=sharing
On 22
June 2021 at 5:40 PM, Sally Wu (吳宜錚) wrote:
It
(Statement 5) means
(You,
Yi-De Lin MUST) Give me NT250 to buy 1,000 pieces of paper with QR code and
client's photos.
She capitalized the "G" of
"Give" in her email, but in the original December 2020 court
submission, she implied that I am specifically demanding money from the owner
the
(Remember, I NEED advertisement. Why would I risk going to jail to stop
someone from advertising? That makes no
sense!)
Find the email in the 25 June 2021
submission to Tainan District Prosecutors, a PDF copy is linked. The email is on page 20:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1TOmgIvbsQj353eh02k6P1fZavYVCRew5/view?usp=sharing
The
second paid translation provided by
We want to make sure that Sally understands
her mistake.
On 21 June 2021, I contacted Department
Of Translation Studies (翻譯學系) Assistant Manager Kai-Hui
Chen (陳凱惠) and began a second paid
contract with
Kai-Hui Chen (陳凱惠) chose the translator.
On 21 June 2021 at 3:55,
Dear
Rene
I
am Sally Wu, a translator introduced by CJCU. I can work on your case and the
fee is NT$1500. Let me know whether you will accept the fee. Tks a lot.
I wanted to make sure that Sally (吳宜錚) translates Statement 2A accurately. That means, I had to teach her what I wanted her to say. In other words, I literally taught her how to translate my statement. That's really not a compliment to the Chang Jung Department Of Translation Studies.
On 22 June 2021 at 2:49 PM, I wrote to Sally:
Hi Sally,
I'd like to keep our work as simple as possible, if that's ok?
I want to confirm our agreement before I send the document:
1500NT$ buys me one Chinese translation of a document with up to 1500 English words, correct?
I want to make sure that you're not going to argue with me when I happily provide 1500NT$ to translate less than 1500 English words into Chinese.
I wasn't sure if Sally understood the entire contents, but she confirmed understanding the general meaning of the English phrase "buys me". She replied on 22 June 2021 at 3:39 PM:
Dear
Rene,
Yes,
that's correct, NT$1,500 for 1,500 English words.
In later emails we confirmed the
"up to" part. Namely: if I
only send Sally a total of 30 words (in two short sentences), then I am still
obligated to pay CJCU 1500NT$. She
agreed, and I did pay.
I emailed Sally
(吳宜錚) the two statements on 22 June 2021,
at 4:05 PM:
I
need only two statements translated.
Please
translate and return in this email.
This
is all I need:
1.
Money provides me the ability to buy fliers at a print shop.
2.
nt$250 buys me 1000 pieces of paper with a QR code and pictures of your
clients.
Remember, this is the same translator
who submitted the Statement 5 to the Tainan District Court in a letter dated 9
Dec 2020:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/15mE4kznPR0m5JiYkl1zZBq9ai3luodM1/view?usp=sharing
Sally replied on 22 June 2021 at 4:29
PM:
Dear
Rene
Here
you go. The word count for these two is 30.
Thank
you.
1.
Money provides me the ability to buy fliers at a print shop.
錢讓我可以在影印店買濾網
2.
nt$250 buys me 1000 pieces of paper with a QR code and pictures of your
clients.
NT$250可以讓我買1000張上方印有QR Code的紙和你客戶的照片
I wanted to confirm the meeting of the
second statement. I asked if her
statement 2 meant the same as Statement 5.
On 22 June 2021 (most of this happened on 22 June) at 5:28 PM, I asked Sally (吳宜錚):
Does
(5)
台幣250元跟我買1000張有QR code和你客戶的照片。
mean
that I can go to the print shop (or go somewhere--the name of the place doesn't
need to be mentioned), and buy as many fliers (advertisements, pieces of paper)
as long as I have enough money?
That's when Sally
(吳宜錚) answered "No" and told me
what Statement 5 means (it's quoted above).
She added that her second statement
means:
NT$250
allows me to buy 1,000 pieces of paper printed with QR code and photos of your
clients.
Is
this a mistake?
I couldn't believe that the same
translator just translated the same English statement two different ways. So I asked the Assistant Manager Kai-Hui Chen
(陳凱惠). Kai-Hui confirmed that the same translator translated
Statement 2A in December 2020 and in June 2021, and that translator was Sally
Wu.
On 22 June 2021 at 6:55 PM, Sally
wrote:
My
name is Sally Wu (吳宜錚). I am an Assistant
Professor at 長榮大學翻譯學系。 Today's date is 22 June 2021
(
我是吳宜錚，我是長榮大學翻譯學系的助理教授。今天是2021年6月22日(中華民國110年)。我在此確認此英文句子：
2a、「nt$250‧buys‧me‧1000‧pieces‧of‧paper‧with‧a‧QR‧code‧and‧pictures‧of‧your‧clients. 」
means
意思為：
2b、「NT$250可以讓我列印1000張上方有QR Code你客戶照片的紙。」
The
English statement does NOT mean:
英文陳述之意不是：
5、"台幣250元跟我買1000張有QR‧code和你客戶的照片。"
The
English statement also does not mean:
此英文句子之意也不是：
6、"你要以一張台幣250元，一共1000張,跟我買上面印有QR‧code和有你們客戶肖像的傳單。"
The
Question of Intent
A reader left a comment on the Welcome
page to CJCU, http://p13.rene.guru
Are
you sure the translator you mentioned is qualified enough to be a court
translator and also an expert?
There are two replies on 2 July 2021:
pretty
sure:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1umnB4npP2iqyXh3rPbcLM0nzrwUrI5O2/view?usp=sharing
Here's
a short-hand, in case the link isn't clickable:
The document at the link provides
extensive information about Sally.
Apparently she's been a court-appointed translator over 10 years, and
she's led a number of class, or courses, about translation and ethics, to senior
court officials!
The real question is of intent:
Did
Sally Wu intend to submit a false translation to the court?
Obviously, a professor doesn't want to
risk losing their job by committing intentional perjury. But perjury which is "not"
intentional IS intention IF the professor insists on keeping the knowingly
false translation in court.
For that reason, I specifically
informed the translator that her translations are inconsistent. And I specifically asked the translator to
help me cancel the error.
I need the university to withdrawal
all translations that it provided the court about me. Not some translations but all translations
because I can't be certain of the quality of the translations until I
personally verify them. It's important
that I personally verify every translation from a university which previously
submitted false translations.
Here's what Sally wrote on 24 June
2021 at 6:04 AM:
Dear
Rene
Please
understand that I did my best to translate according to the context and there is more
than one translation submitted to the court (according to the court paper). I
submitted my expert opinion towards emails you sent to some managers of the
cram school and the court made decision about who to trust. I had and have no
control over this part and I am sorry to know this ruling result. If you need
me to refund your NT$1,500, just let me know. I have no other things to say and
if you think I shall be fully responsible for your ruling, you can take me to
the court. Follow the normal procedure to file your complaints as I told my
university.
Sally is UNWILLING to admit to her
mistake AND she's willing to allow the court to decide that I am guilty of
criminal extortion (Blackmail) on the basis of her false verification of an
original false translation from a fraudulent cram school.
THEREFORE, she declares WAR on ME, not
vice versa. Make sure you understand
that, Alex.
This began with a translation from
Find information about Kidsland at http://p7.rene.guru
I sincerely believe that Kidsland senior
managers Clare (江佩樺), Denise (徐乙彤), and Stacy (黃姿瑜) deliberately submitted an incorrect translation of Statement 2A to
the prosecutors to distract prosecutors from beginning proceedings of criminal
fraud against the school.
A description of Criminal Fraud at
I'm continuing to develop that
argument until they decide to partner with us, of course. Since, in the end, we're all going to agree
to working together to support the SAME SUSTAINABLE ENVIRONMENT. We only have one of those, after all. And our personal beliefs about God really
don't matter. Thereafter, I'll go after
the tenth psychiatrist.
I've add links to documents able to
support the allegation, since the managers previously gave false statements in
court to hide their criminal fraud on p8.
The managers claim my Statement 2A means:
6、"你要以一張台幣250元，一共1000張,跟我買上面印有QR‧code和有你們客戶肖像的傳單。"
Google translates Chinese statement
(6) as:
6b、NT$250 each piece, 1000
pieces in total, buy flyers from me.
Remember that the original statement
is from a polite warning to the managers emailed on 16 Oct 2018:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1NVqBbfb3JXVHk89byCUZaPSUWwwU5Jxo/view?usp=sharing
The warning wasn't only to the
managers, it was to the ENTIRE management.
The email was addressed to Yide Lin, 林義德.
That guy owns
So, really, the ONLY hope I have of
not being convicted is to ADVERTISE. I
figure "publicity ensures consistency", and, as long as I'm always
striving to be "not mutually exclusive", I've got to end up with a
legal argument to rule the world, like, slap the elite council of
super-gods-on-earth upside the head with a ruler.
And that means, Mr. Alex Lee (李泳龍), President (校長),
Please DO reference exactly WHY Taiwan
DOES belong to
AND REALIZE
THAT
IF I am convicted OF a criminal
offence IN Taiwan, I MUST leave
https://drive.google.com/file/d/17PlSrGrCXwFrLCD-bVAOzb7qCTWfP8eW/view?usp=sharing
AND if I LEAVE Taiwan, I'm going to China
and convincing them to begin international ligigation against ongoing
corruption in Taiwan, corruption which I can prove exists at the local level
(because the contents of http://p8.rene.guru
are still not being investigated DESPITE BEING MY LEGAL DEFENCE AGAINST THE
ALLEGIONS OF LIBEL AGAINST ME)
and...
well...
like that 16 Oct 2018 email said:
While
we argue about working together... more and more government people will take
notice and help you to stop your nonsense.
At that point, you will be broken.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1NVqBbfb3JXVHk89byCUZaPSUWwwU5Jxo/view?usp=sharing
On 24 June 2021 at 6:04 AM, Sally
wrote:
Dear
Rene
Please
understand that I did my best to translate according to the CONTEXT...
PLEASE ENSURE YOU, ALEX, UNDERSTAND
THE CONTEXT.
If we're arguing about working
together, then we're not working together are we?
And IF you're not willing to testify
in court of law that you represent THE SAME GOD that I represent, THE GOD THAT
GOVERNS OUR COLLECTIVE MENTAL HEALTH, then I suggest you decide, rather expeditiously,
to contact the Tainan District Court and remove all translations which CJCU
submitted about me. ALL OF THEM. The court file number is at the top.
I'll ask about that in court on 13
July 2021.
IF THE COURT DOES NOT CONFIRM THAT
CJCU WITHDREW ALL TRANSLATIONS ABOUT ME, I'll appeal any conviction, of course,
and begin Civil Proceedings against you, and CJCU, following this very public
message directly AT
Criminal
Perjury at CJCU (長榮大學) update 2 July 2021
TO: Alex Lee (李泳龍), President (校長)
Lastly, in the event you want to begin
Republic Of CHINA Criminal Code Article 310 allegations of libel against me,
Rene Helmerichs（中華民國：是瑞內） on grounds of the current
content at http://p13.rene.guru , I've preserved a printable PDF copy (with the
noted reply, and link to Sally Wu's profile) at:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1hb2CmUCdb5tP9XxqTs75SRfUMEsCDWZh/view?usp=sharing
Use that copy if you want to file with
the prosecutors, since the link to http://sally.talk2dream.com
alongside this document is also automatically MY defence.
This is Alex Lee:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1S7pQPFYVeZs7RAz864ejJcc905S0mkNX/view?usp=sharing
Live at:
http://reneguru.blogspot.com/2021/07/TCTL0001.html
See how easily misunderstandings can
happen?
That whole time we were STILL talking
about just WHAT a misunderstanding actually IS:
Are you ready yet to help Me save the
world?
====
#rene.guru
End
of page. Comment on the Main Page:
Journal Of A Schizophrenic, with a
twist of mental order.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.