Upholding the Republic Of China Constitution

www.MiracleU.org schleps Taiwan's Lawyers (TLAW)

_page0017 | dated 25 Aug 2021, by Rene Helmerichs with Google Translate

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/District_court_(Taiwan)#List_of_District_Courts

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_court_(Taiwan)#List_of_high_courts

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supreme_Court_of_the_Republic_of_China

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Court_of_Justice

Pages 17 and 18 are dedicated to Civil litigation in Taiwan, related directly to the greater plan of Page 1.

第17頁和第18頁專門討論台灣的民事訴訟，與第1頁的更大計劃直接相關。

There are basically two main ways to clobber someone upside the head with common sense. The first is a criminal proceeding. The second is a civil proceeding. To be really thorough, I'm trying to use both. Prosecutor investigations are listed in the TPRO section (http://p12.rene.guru) , or they will be listed on a currently not existing page, if I have to do it without help from the prosecutors. But we might be in International Court by then, unless they come to their senses.

基本上有兩種主要方法可以用常識來打擊某人。首先是刑事訴訟。二是民事訴訟。為了真正徹底，我正在嘗試同時使用兩者。檢察官的調查列在TPRO部分(http://p12.rene.guru)中，或者如果我必須在沒有檢察官幫助的情況下進行，它們將列在當前不存在的頁面上。但到那時我們可能會在國際法庭上，除非他們醒悟過來。

There are three general levels of courts in Taiwan:

1. The court of first instance, the local court, the district court, the low court.

2. The court of second instance, the High court, the district branch of Taiwan's High Court system

3. The court of third instance, the Supreme court.

台灣法院一般分為三級：

1、一審法院、地方法院、地區法院、低級法院。

2、二審法院，高等法院，台灣高等法院系統地區分院

3、三審法院，最高法院。

Beyond that, there is the Constitutional Court, which has its office inside the main building of the Judicial Yuan. The Judicial Yuan oversees the entire court system. But the Constitutional Court isn't really a place to argue a Civil case. It's more a place to send a letter of complaint when a serious violation of the Constitution occurs. So anything of this story to Taiwan's Constitutional Court is listed on Page 22, YUAN Pages (http://p22.rene.guru ).

除此之外，還有憲法法院，其辦公室設在司法院主樓內。司法院監督整個法院系統。但憲法法院並不是真正爭論民事案件的地方。它更像是發生嚴重違反憲法時發送投訴信的地方。所以台灣憲法法院的任何故事都列在第22頁，袁頁（http://p22.rene.guru）。

Two addition courts have been involved, but are not currently involved. These are the court currently involved in this story, on the next page, Page 18:

另外兩個法院已經參與，但目前沒有參與。這些是目前涉及這個故事的法庭，在下一頁，第18頁：

Taiwan Tainan District Court

中華民國臺灣省臺南地方法庭

708臺南市安平區健康路三段308號

Taiwan Qiatou District Court

中華民國臺灣省橋頭地方法院民事

82546高雄市橋頭區經武路911號

Tainan District branch of Taiwan's High Court

中華民國臺灣省高等法院臺南分院民事庭

700臺南市中西區中山路170號

Next Page 18, TLAW Suits: http://p18.rene.guru

"Are You ready yet to help us save the world?" ~A Course In Miracles

====

Upholding the Republic Of China Constitution

LuciferChristForWorldPeace (at that) gmail.com

#rene.guru | www.MiracleU.org | http://talk2dream.com

End of page.

三名凱仕蘭經理的刑事偽證，中华民国110年7月23日更新

_klss0015 | dated 25 July 2021, by Rene Helmerichs

PDF: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1vb59TuptmoRxA4B9gXIfGLQ_Ht3dtMox/view?usp=sharing

Track: http://reneguru.blogspot.com/2021/06/tpro0001.html

708203臺南市安平區健康路三段310號

受文者：臺灣臺南地方檢察署

發文日期：中華民國110年7月23日

發文字號：tpro0001、第1次

中華民國 | Taiwan

臺灣臺南地方檢察署

Tainan District Procuratorate, case file:

110他3227：義

被告（有三個）| Defendants: (There are three)

一起工作：701台南市東區長榮路二段32巷6號

一起工作：06-2082888、06-5118086

1、江佩樺（Jiang Peihua、Clare Chiang）總經理

2、徐乙彤（Xu Yitong、Denise "Madness" Xu）教學部經理

3、黃姿瑜（Huang Ziyu、Stacy Huang）ESL項目經理

主旨 | Purpose

106年5月20日和106年12月28日的會面記錄。106年5月20日的記錄證明，被告人在聘請瑞內之前知道並理解並充分意識到外國英語教師瑞內在加拿大有犯罪記錄的事實瑞內於106年5月26日擔任教師。106年5月20日的電話錄音和隨後日期為106年5月26日的電子郵件證明，被告無意核實加拿大刑事定罪與性無關。106年12月28日的記錄證明被告在107年11月26日的聽證會上故意欺騙民事法院法官。107年11月26日，兩名被告均聲稱不知道瑞內在加拿大的刑事定罪或872天監禁在精神病院。

Meeting records from 20 May 2017 and 28 Dec 2017. The record of 20 May 2017 proves both Defendants knew and understand and were fully consciously aware of the fact that foreign English teacher Rene (瑞內) had a criminal record in Canada before they hired Rene (瑞內) as a teacher on 26 May 2017. The telephone recordings from 20 May 2017 and subsequent email dated 26 May 2017 prove the defendant had no intention of verifying that the Canadian criminal convictions were not sexually related. The record of 28 Dec 2017 proves the defendants intentionally deceived the Civil Court judge during the hearing on 26 Nov 2018. On 26 Nov 2018, both defendants claimed not to know about Rene (瑞內)'s Canadian criminal convictions or 872 days of imprisonment in psychiatric institutions.

隨附DVD上的文件說明（12個文件，2個二維碼）

Description of DVD files (12 files, 2 QR Codes):

一、文件名：《20170520u2_meeting_transcript_34p.pdf》

106年5月20日瑞內（Rene）、瑞內的妻子蕭帆琇（Lindsay）和凱仕蘭（Kidsland）補習班經理徐乙彤和江佩樺（Clare）面對面：書面會議記錄（至少與瑞內個人有時間轉錄的一樣多）。

1. The 20 May 2017 in-person meeting between Rene (瑞內), Rene (瑞內)'s wife Lindsay (蕭帆琇), and Kidsland (凱仕蘭) cram school managers Denise (徐乙彤) and Clare (江佩樺): the written meeting record (at least as much as Rene (瑞內) personally had time to transcribe)

https://drive.google.com/file/d/145zs_1nVsac1hocmP6HoPt9g0KCRM2u5/view?usp=sharing

二、文件名：《20170520_001_Kidsland_meeting.m4a》

及：《20170520_002_Kidsland_meeting.m4a》

106年5月20日瑞內、蕭帆琇（Lindsay）和凱仕蘭補習班經理徐乙彤和江佩樺面對面：兩個 MP4（音頻）文件中的會議原始錄音。

2. The 20 May 2017 in-person meeting between Rene (瑞內), Rene (瑞內)'s wife Lindsay (蕭帆琇), and Kidsland (凱仕蘭) cram school managers Denise (徐乙彤) and Clare (江佩樺): the original audio recordings of the meeting in two MP4 (audio) files.

001: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1R_encC4FC_4t66tOa3zFejvK2DlDxofS/view?usp=sharing

002: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1u_MPmzfOnumR2QJEWoKJ9HAGGWDopJtt/view?usp=sharing

ALL: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1wCSq3aqA2qPHXo5X8HGF2iX6g-t1dSVu?usp=sharing

三、文件名：《20170520_003_call_14-34-18_IN_0915532820.mp3》

及：《20170520_004_call_15-50-28_OUT_0915532820.mp3》

106年5月20日瑞內、蕭帆琇（Lindsay）和凱仕蘭補習班經理徐乙彤和江佩樺面對面：與徐乙彤、瑞內和蕭帆琇進行了兩次後續電話交談。

3. The 20 May 2017 in-person meeting between Rene (瑞內), Rene (瑞內)'s wife Lindsay (蕭帆琇), and Kidsland (凱仕蘭) cram school managers Denise (徐乙彤) and Clare (江佩樺): two follow-up telephone conversations with Denise (徐乙彤), Rene (瑞內), and Lindsay (蕭帆琇).

003: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1w18sLFe8k5mTgFQO5aLbt3VDRN5rdbrs/view?usp=sharing

004: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1VmuXwtCuzv0QjcsjHfEa9ks9gSPz8w7O/view?usp=sharing

ALL: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1wCSq3aqA2qPHXo5X8HGF2iX6g-t1dSVu?usp=sharing

四、文件名：《20170526_Gmail_and_contract_10p.pdf》

106年5月26日凱仕蘭教學部經理徐乙彤的電子郵件告訴瑞內不要提交犯罪記錄檢查。兩年的教學合同（106年7月1日至108年7月31日）是在電子郵件發出幾個小時後簽署的。電子郵件（1頁）和合同（9頁）在一起。

4. The 26 May 2017 email from Kidsland (凱仕蘭) Teaching Department manager (教學部經理) Denise (徐乙彤) tells Rene (瑞內) not to submit a criminal record check. The two-year teaching contract (1 July 2017 to 31 July 2019) was signed a few hours after the email. The email (1 page) and contract (9 pages) are together.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/10gz_5ujQT3KYxfA2tTDT7GFnVn7Q63dj/view?usp=sharing

五、文件名：《20171228u2_meeting_transcript_50p.pdf》

106年12月28日瑞內（Rene）和凱仕蘭補習班經理徐乙彤（Denise）和黃姿瑜（Stacy）的面對面會議：書面會議記錄（至少與瑞內親自有過的一樣多）轉錄時間）。

5. The 28 Dec 2017 in-person meeting between Rene (瑞內) and Kidsland (凱仕蘭) cram school managers Denise (徐乙彤) and Stacy (黃姿瑜): the written meeting record (at least as much as Rene (瑞內) personally had time to transcribe).

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1yQIaW-Ya1g3woFmiH_3F4Pc8zTMu_prK/view?usp=sharing

六、文件名：《20171228_001_Kidsland_meeting.m4a》

106年12月28日瑞內和凱仕蘭補習班經理徐乙彤（Denise）和黃姿瑜（Stacy）的面對面會議：一個 MP4（音頻）文件中的原始錄音。

6. The 28 Dec 2017 in-person meeting between Rene (瑞內) and Kidsland (凱仕蘭) cram school managers Denise (徐乙彤) and Stacy (黃姿瑜): the original audio recording in one MP4 (audio) file.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1cx_tLwvAIliagwFfiaHRe8XYAIZDChfX/view?usp=sharing

七、文件名：《20181126_Civil_Court_Ch_23p.pdf》

107年11月26日的法庭記錄。

7. The court record from 26 Nov 2018.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1kOni24X4DUZKx1-DcrPahY6ZLy0cpnfE/view?usp=sharing

八、文件名：《20181126_Civil_Court_En_Ch_23p.pdf》

107年11月26日的法庭記錄翻譯成英文，由於瑞內不會中文，也不會真正打字，只能聽懂不到20%的中文口語。我們在審問瑞內關於這個案子時需要英文副本。

8. The court record from 26 Nov 20018 translated into English, since Rene (瑞內) cannot read Chinese, cannot actually type Chinese, and only understands less than 20% of spoken Chinese. We'll need the English copy during interrogations of Rene (瑞內) about this case.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1crJ8nQaq0dPqIEzxkykD7oF96C6kPU1Q/view?usp=sharing

九、文件名：《20210521_Kidsland_Perjury_20p.pdf》

指控，說明和依據，107年11月26日法庭記錄中的陳述樣本。

9. Accusations, explanation and basis, sample statements from the 26 Nov 2018 court record.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1vaSdCFmdOICyzBXN2MWW5WuUEN8m-huM/view?usp=sharing

十、文件名：《tpro0001_20210723_stamp_5p.pdf》

這個文件。

10. This document.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1vb59TuptmoRxA4B9gXIfGLQ_Ht3dtMox/view?usp=sharing

二維碼鏈接到跟踪本文件及其聲明的調查的網站。這使調查人員和記者可以自由訪問所有信息。它還允許將此案件與與同一被告或整個檢察官辦公室有關的其他案件聯繫起來。如果DVD在檢察官辦公室與本文件分開，則第二個QR提供了該文件的直接下載，其中包含指向所附DVD上每個部分的可點擊鏈接。

The QR Code links to a website tracking the investigation of this document and its claim. This allows investigator and journalists free access to all information. It also allows this case to be linked to other cases related to the same defendants, or the prosecutor's office as a whole. A second QR offers a direct download of this document with clickable links to each of the Parts on the attached DVD, should the DVD become separated from this document in the prosecutor's office.