Wednesday, July 7, 2021

1、「芝麻街凱仕蘭經紀人對教師及家長撒謊,芝麻街凱仕蘭想要取悅家長,唯有取悅,這些家長才會毫不猶豫地掏出錢來。」

Journal Of A Schizophrenic, with a twist.

http://reneguru.blogspot.com/2021/07/klss0001.html

 

 

1. Kidsland wants parents to be happy. Happy parents give money without question.

_klss0001 | updated 8 July 2021, by Rene Helmerichs


QR: http://reneguru.blogspot.com/2021/07/klss0001.html

The Translator (T-7.II.4.) gave Rene permission to print this, WITHOUT ruining the school's reputation, because this is part of a defence which explicitly exposes a much greater action of criminal activity occurring at the school.  Something Rene is asking the court's help to correct!

翻譯員允許是瑞內在不損害學校聲譽的情況下打印此文件,因為這是辯護的一部分,明確揭露了在學校發生的更嚴重的犯罪活動。瑞內請求法庭幫助糾正的事情!

 

Introducing 12 attention-getting statements |介紹12條引人注目的聲明

所有12條誹謗言論的引言都相同

On 26 Nov 2018, three senior managers of Kidsland Sesame Street (Clare, Denise, and Stacy) told a little lie in Tainan District Civil Court file 「臺南區民事法院107年勞訴字第60號」

107中國年1126日,芝麻街凱仕蘭三名高級管理,江佩樺(Clare)、徐乙彤(Denise)和黃姿瑜(Stacy),在台南區民事法院案卷中撒了個小謊「臺南區民事法院107年勞訴字第60號」

The little lie grew and grew.  And it had been growing since 28 Dec 2017, when the managers asked their Schizophrenic teacher, Rene, not to tell their clients about his criminal history or mental health struggles.  The managers insisted "this is Taiwan, nobody cares about your Canadian history" and "we don't want to scare anyone".

這個小謊言越來越大。自1061228日以來,這種情況一直在增長,當時管理人員要求他們的精神分裂症老師瑞內不要告訴他們的客戶他的犯罪歷史或心理健康問題。經理們堅稱「這是台灣,沒有人關心你在加拿大的歷史」和「我們不想嚇到任何人」。

Nine doctors declared Rene a delusional, severely ill, man who suffers from a range of serious mental disorders including Bipolar Disorder, Obsessive-Compulsive Personality Disorder, Schizophrenia, Schizoaffective Disorder, and more.  Most importantly, Delusional Disorder and paranoia. 

九位醫生宣布瑞內Rene為妄想症重病患者,患有一系列嚴重的精神障礙,包括雙相情感障礙、強迫性人格障礙、精神分裂症、分裂情感障礙等。最重要的是,妄想症和偏執狂。

In reality, Rene's only real problem is the different spiritual voices he hears.  He decides what to do based on what he hears (he usually does the opposite, namely, what the voices are afraid he's going to do).  That way, Rene is forcing people's own spirits to join together in a common project to achieve real worldwide peace, without harming anyone.

瑞內唯一真正的問題是他聽到不同的精神聲音。他根據他聽到的來決定做什麼(他通常做相反的事情,聲音害怕他會做什麼)。這樣,瑞內正在迫使人們自己的精神聯合起來,共同實現世界和平,而不傷害任何人。

Rene told the managers about his past on 20 May 2017, before the managers hired Rene.  Rene specifically told the managers that doctors accused Rene of crimes which he didn't commit.  Rene told the managers that, when Rene demanded a criminal trial, the doctors declared Rene legally insane.  The doctors kept Rene locked in solitary confinement and forcibly medicated Rene until Rene admitted to criminal guilt.

106520日,在經理聘請瑞內之前,瑞內向經理講述了他的過去。瑞內特別告訴經理,醫生指控瑞內犯了他沒有犯下的罪行。瑞內告訴管理人員,當瑞內要求刑事審判時,醫生宣布瑞內在法律上精神失常。醫生將瑞內關在單獨監禁中,並強行給瑞內服藥,直到瑞內承認犯罪。

Managers insisted Rene should deceive managers, teachers, and over 2500 clients of the 13 Kidsland Sesame Street cram schools on 28 Dec 2017.  Find the locations listed at http://p7.rene.guru .  But deceiving anyone isn't going to help us achieve real worldwide peace, is it?

經理堅持瑞內應該在1061228日欺騙芝麻街13家芝麻街凱仕蘭補習班的經理、老師和2500多名客戶。查找 http://p7.rene.guru 中列出的位置。但欺騙任何人並不能幫助我們實現真正的全球和平,是嗎?

Rene certainly never agreed to deceive anyone, since peace depends on honesty, and honesty requires consistency of laws.  When the cram school managers told Rene that they want Rene to deceive clients who trusted Rene, Rene simply became more public.  After all, telling Rene what you don't want Rene to do is only going to make him ask you "Why not?" 

瑞內當然從不同意欺騙任何人,因為和平取決於誠實,而誠實需要法律的一致性。當補習班經理告訴瑞內他們希望瑞內欺騙信任瑞內的客戶時,瑞內變得更加公開。畢竟,告訴瑞內你不希望瑞內做什麼,只會讓他問你「為什麼不呢?」

The above statement is one of twelve which Kidsland Sesame Street English school managers allege is ruining the school's reputation.  But the managers are deceiving prosecutors about the fact that they knowingly evaded Taiwan's national security checks to hire a foreign convicted criminal whom psychiatrists declared too crazy to work as a teacher. 

上述聲明是芝麻街凱仕蘭英語學校經理聲稱破壞學校聲譽的十二項聲明之一。但這些管理人員正在欺騙檢察官,因為他們故意逃避台灣的國家安全檢查,聘請一名外國罪犯,精神病學家稱他太瘋狂而不能當老師。

Specifically, reference this excerpt of a conversation between Rene (瑞內) and General Manager Clare (江佩樺), and head of the Teaching Department, manager Denise (徐乙彤).  A PDF copy of the entire transcript is linked below the excerpt.  The PDF includes a link to the original voice recording!  This conversation took place on 20 May 2017, beginning at 10:41 am.  The indicated times are from the start of the audio-recording.  The conversation occurred 6 days before Rene and the school signed a two-year teaching contract:

1:07:16 Rene to Clare: And here's why I don't have a choice: in your contract, you're asking for a criminal record check. 

1:07:23 Clare: Yeah

1:07:26 Denise: Ohhhh.

1:07:28 Rene to Clare: I will fail that.  However--

1:07:32 (Denise speaking Chinese to Clare): Sway, ta shi--

1:07:33 Denise to Rene: You have a record?

1:07:34 Rene to Denise: Yes. 

具體可以參考這段瑞內(Rene)與總經理江佩樺(Clare)、教學部部長徐乙彤經理(Denise)的對話。整個記錄的PDF副本鏈接在摘錄下方。PDF包含原始錄音的鏈接!該對話於2017共同年520日上午10:41開始。指示的時間是從錄音的開始。談話發生在Rene和學校簽訂為期兩年的教學合同前6天:

1:07:16瑞內對江佩樺:這就是我別無選擇的原因:在你的合同中,你要求進行犯罪記錄檢查。

1:07:23 江佩樺:是的

1:07:26徐乙彤:哦。

1:07:28徐乙彤對江佩樺:我會失敗的。然而 -

1:07:32(徐乙彤對江佩樺說中文):Swayta shi--

1:07:33徐乙彤對瑞內:你有記錄嗎?

1:07:34瑞內對徐乙彤:是的。

https://drive.google.com/file/d/145zs_1nVsac1hocmP6HoPt9g0KCRM2u5/view?usp=sharing

The teacher only wants his credibility restored!  He had asked the school to help restore his credibility, and they agreed.  Now they're trying to renege the original agreement.  The criminal court file in the Tainan District Court is 「南院武刑歲1081170字第1090042211號」.

老師只想恢復他的信譽!他曾要求學校幫助恢復他的信譽,他們同意了。現在他們正試圖違背最初的協議。台南地方法院刑事案卷為「南院武刑歲1081170字第1090042211號」。

Even more incredible, the judge allows a psychiatrist to say "Sorry, I can't perform the court-requested mental assessment because Rene refuses to believe that thinking originates in his body.  You'll just have to accept the fact he's Schizophrenic, and just never receive an official assessment from me".  Reference:

更不可思議的是,刑事法庭的法官目前允許精神病醫生說:「對不起,我不能執行法庭要求的心理評估,因為瑞內拒絕相信思想起源於他的身體。你只需要接受他患有精神分裂症的事實,而且從未收到我的正式評估。」參考:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1UB3LevcG-g1wDSdIBKPeRjZO4BZCtmlh/view?usp=sharing

Without surprise, the Tainan District Criminal court did not investigate this submission establishing the above statement as true and publicly relevant, and therefore not malicious character destruction.  If anything, this page, together with the rest, establishes that Taiwan's legal system is corrupt.

不出所料,台南區刑事法院沒有調查此陳述,證明上述陳述是真實的和公開相關的,因此沒有惡意破壞人格。如果有的話,這個頁面和其他頁面一起確定台灣的法律體係是腐敗的。

Referenced Exhibits are available online in the following folder:

參考可在以下文件夾中在線獲得:

https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1wlDbKCO0t8x-H5dvgLlrFPvrBBdl8bjJ?usp=sharing

The following was the submission to the Tainan District Criminal Court on 29 April 2020.  Reference pages 10 to 15 in the linked PDF:

以下是109中國年429日提交給台南地區刑事法院的文件。鏈接PDF中的參考頁1015

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1cWDfuQ1ZgoUFFSIzZh9KJSaBny6YHW70/view?usp=sharing

 


1. "Kidsland wants parents to be happy.  Happy parents give money without question."

1、「芝麻街凱仕蘭經紀人對教師及家長撒謊,芝麻街凱仕蘭想要取悅家長,唯有取悅,這些家長才會毫不猶豫地掏出錢來。」

The Chinese language did not come from Rene, so deny its evidence capacity, and please investigate the truth of the English statement.  Definitely investigate the English statement!

中文聲明並非來自瑞內,所以否認其證據能力,請調查英語陳述的真實性。一定要查一下英文的說法!

 

Truth | 真實

This is a basic psychological fact: the purpose of reassuring business clients is to keep them as business clients.  Kidsland didn't allow Rene to tell clients that he was in prison in Canada, and Kidsland was unwilling (refused) to prepare a reassuring statement to explain that Canada illegally imprisoned Kidsland's teacher, as shown in Rene Exhibit D009.  Therefore, Kidsland wants clients to pay tuition without asking questions (without any doubt).

這是一個基本的心理事實:向業務客戶保證的目的是使他們保持業務客戶身份。凱仕蘭不允許凱仕蘭的老師告訴客戶他曾在加拿大的監獄的事,及凱仕蘭不願(拒絕)準備一份令人放心的聲明,以解釋加拿大非法監禁了瑞內,如瑞內證D009號所示。因此,凱仕蘭希望客戶毫無疑問地支付學費。

Rene Exhibit D009 is the 21 Feb 2020 submission to Tainan District Civil Court branch of Taiwan's High Court system. 

The submission contains voice speech transcripts of two meetings, one on 20 May 2017 and one on 28 Dec 2017. 

The voice speech recordings demonstrate Kidsland (凱仕蘭) managers knew Kidsland's teacher is a convicted criminal, and Kidsland managers concealed the criminal record from the Taiwan government.  Kidsland ultimately lied to Taiwan prosecutors, and courtroom judges, to cover up ongoing fraud.

瑞內證D009號是109221日提交台灣高等法院系統台南區民事法院分支機構的文件。

提交的內容包含兩次會議的語音記錄,一次會議於106520日,一次會議於1061228日。

語音記錄顯示,凱仕蘭(Kidsland)的經理知道凱仕蘭的老師是被定罪的罪犯,凱仕蘭的經理向台灣政府隱瞞了犯罪記錄。凱仕蘭最終向台灣檢察官和法庭法官說謊,以掩蓋正在進行的欺詐行為。

Exhibit D011 is an excerpt of a 28 Dec 2017 meeting voice recording between Rene, and Kidsland managers Denise Madness Xu (徐乙彤) and Stacy Huang (黃姿瑜). 

Denise and Stacy represent Kidsland's General Manager Clare Chiang (江佩樺). 

The 28 Dec 2017 conversation was circular and centered around the idea of not telling, or telling, clients that Rene was in jail in Canada

The word "jail" is mentioned in time intervals: 5:05 to 5:34, 18:36 to 18:51, 22:15 to 23:05, 24:17 to 24:23, 25:24 to 25:55, and 27:53 to 29:08.  The word "criminal" is referenced in time intervals: 7:15 to 7:48, 24:54 to 25:07, 25:15 to 25:23, 25:24 to 25:55, 27:53 to 29:08, 40:37 to 40:40, 42:42 to 43:12, and 43:15 to 43:54.

瑞內證D011號是瑞內與凱仕蘭經理徐乙彤(Denise)和黃姿瑜(Stacy)之間1061228日會議錄音的節錄。

徐乙彤和黃姿瑜代表Kidsland的總經理江佩樺(Clare)。

1061228日的對話是循環的,圍繞不告訴或告訴客戶瑞內在加拿大監獄中的想法。

在時間間隔中提到“jail”(監獄)一詞:5:05534183618512215230524172423252425:5527:5329:08。在以下時間間隔中引用“criminal”(刑事、犯罪或犯罪記錄)一詞:7:15748245425072515252325242555275329:0840:3740:4042:4243:1243:1543:54

Kidsland never conducted the statutory criminal record check, and did not verify whether the indictments were sex crimes. 

If the indictments are sex crimes, the offender is not legally allowed to be a cram school teacher in Taiwan according to Article 9 of the Supplementary Education Act, 《補習及進修教育法》第9, and Article 81-1 of The Protection of Children and Youths Welfare and Rights Act, 《兒童及少年福利與權益保障法》第81-1.

凱仕蘭從未進行過法定犯罪記錄檢查,也沒有驗證起訴書是否屬於性犯罪。

如果起訴書是性犯罪,則根據《補習及進修教育法》第9條和《兒童及少年福利與權益保障法》第81-1條,該罪犯在台灣不得合法擔任補習班老師。

At recording time 4:52, Rene states "I am telling you that it is in the best interest of Kidsland to pre-empt that situation.  It means, take care of it ahead of time." 

At time 7:20 Stacy Huang (黃姿瑜) asks "Why that way will they [Kidsland clients] find out?" 

At time 7:47 Denise Xu (徐乙彤) reiterates "But why [will they discover the truth]?" 

At time 24:54 Denise Xu (徐乙彤) directly tells Rene "I do not give you permission to tell anyone about your criminal history", in English: "I don't say something that you can say about your criminal things."

在記錄時間4:52,瑞內說:我告訴你,要避免這種情況對凱仕蘭的最大利益。就是,提前處理。,「I am telling you that it is in the best interest of Kidsland to preempt that situation.  It means, take care of it ahead of time.

7:20時間,黃姿瑜問:「為什麼(凱仕蘭客戶)會以這種方式找出來?」

徐乙彤在時間7:47重申:「為什麼(他們會發現真相)?」

24:54時,徐乙彤用英語直接告訴瑞內我不允許您向任何人介紹您的犯罪歷史:「I don't say something that you can say about your criminal things.

All managers at Kidsland Sesame Street refused to investigate Rene's criminal convictions, refused to acknowledge that Rene might be a sex offender in Canada, and completely ignored their responsibility to ensure their clients are free from harm. 

At time interval 25:15 of the audio recording of the 28 Dec 2017 meeting at Kidsland Sesame Street, Rene directly exclaims "Denise!  I have a criminal record!"

凱仕蘭芝麻街的所有管理人員均拒絕調查瑞內的刑事定罪,拒絕承認瑞內可能是加拿大的性罪犯,並且完全無視他們確保客戶免受傷害的責任。

1061228日在凱仕蘭芝麻街舉行的會議的錄音時間間隔25:15,瑞內直接喊徐乙彤!我有犯罪記錄!,「Denise! I have a criminal record!

Kidsland General Manager Clare Chiang (江佩樺) gave false testimony concerning facts these facts in Tainan District Civil Court on 26 Nov 2018, case file 107年度勞訴字第60, page 13 lines 17 to 22 of the court transcript. 

A lawyer asks Clare, "When did you know that Rene had a mental illness or was in jail in Canada?"  

Clare answers "I know for sure when I saw the Canadian court hearing certificate in the link of Rene, because Rene has never shown this kind of document to us, and Rene has not provided a good citizen certificate." 

Clare references links in the online statements, posted after 20 Jan 2018, as her source of learning that Rene has a criminal history.

凱仕蘭總經理江佩樺(Clare)於1071126日在台南區民事法院以虛假的證詞作證,案卷107年度勞訴字第60頁,法庭筆錄第13頁第1722行。

律師問江佩樺「你何時知道瑞內在加拿大有精神疾病或坐過牢?」,

江佩樺回答「我是看到瑞內連結裡面的加拿大法院聽證書才確切知道,因為瑞內從來沒有拿過這種文件給我們看過,且瑞內也沒有提供良民證過。」。

江佩樺引用了107120日之後發布的在線聲明中的鏈接,作為她得知瑞內有犯罪史的信息來源。

On 28 Dec 2017, Denise Xu (徐乙彤) was very well aware that Rene had a criminal record in Canada.  Both Clare Chiang (江佩樺) and Denise were present during a first meeting with Rene on 20 May 2017. 

The purpose of the 20 May 2017 was to give a concise oral criminal record to Kidsland, and Rene did that. 

In Civil Court on 26 Nov 2018, Denise directly gave false testimony, under oath, when she answered "It's just a dinner party. Because it's just a dinner party, I didn't pay much attention to what Rene said." (「就只是聚餐。當下因為只是聚餐,所以沒有很注意聽瑞內說什麼。」) to the question "Before you sent that email, did you remember that Clare Chiang, me and you had a meeting on 20 May 2017? Did I mention my imprisonment and mental hospital in Canada?" (「在你發那封郵件之前,是否記得江佩樺、我和你在106520日有個會面?我有沒有提到我在加拿大坐牢及精神病院的事情?」).

Reference Exhibit D009 for an audio-speech transcript of the meeting.

1061228日,徐乙彤非常清楚瑞內在加拿大有犯罪記錄。江佩樺和徐乙彤在106520日與瑞內人的第一次會面期間都在場。

106520日的目的是給凱仕蘭簡明扼要的口頭犯罪記錄說明,瑞內做到了。

1071126日的民事法庭上,徐乙彤在宣誓時向瑞內人回答「就只是聚餐。當下因為只是聚餐,所以沒有很注意聽瑞內說什麼。」提問到「在你發那封郵件之前,是否記得江佩樺、我和你在106520日有個會面?我有沒有提到我在加拿大坐牢及精神病院的事情?」。

會議語音記錄的參考資料瑞內證D009號。

Reference a concise summary of specific instances of false testimony from Kidsland managers in court on 26 Nov 2018 in pages 7 to 9 of Rene Exhibit D010.

請參考1071126日在瑞內證D010號中第79頁上凱仕蘭經理在法庭上作虛假證詞的具體摘要。

Also:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1KWqnM4K8du5plckVMJmBZzy-G-0BCUwL/view?usp=sharing

Perjury of Kidsland Managers was again submitted to the Tainan District Prosecutor's Office on 7 June 2021:

11067日,凱仕蘭經理的偽證再次提交給台南地區檢察官辦公室:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1fUQnarwFPoV8azKqaOV2jsIcorz3l8fM/view?usp=sharing

 

Public interest | 公共利益

Since a background criminal check of teachers is a national statute, and the subsequent conduct of Kidsland managers clearly indicates deceitful intention, this matter is directly relevant to the public.

此事與公眾直接相關,因為對教師的背景刑事檢查是一項國家法規,而凱仕蘭的後續行動清楚地表明了欺騙的意圖。

At time 42:42 in the 28 Dec 2017 meeting recording, Rene directly states "You broke the law.  You broke the government's law--intended law.  You broke the government's intended law."  Rene explains the accusation at time 42:48:  "New teachers need a criminal record check and because I'm a new teacher to your school--".

1061228日會議記錄的時間42:42,瑞內直接聲明您違反了法律。您違反了政府的法律,意圖的法律。您違反了政府的意圖法律。。瑞內在時間42:48解釋了這一指控:新老師需要進行犯罪記錄檢查,因為我是您學校的新老師-”

At recording times 43:18 and 43:21, Denise twice states that the government will disagree that Kidsland intentionally circumvented 《台灣補習及進修教育法》第9.  Then, at recording time 43:27 Denise claims "no one will care about this, you know what I mean?"

在記錄時間43:1843:21,徐乙彤(Denise)兩次聲明,政府將不同意凱仕蘭故意規避《台灣補習及進修教育法》第9條。然後,在錄製時間43:27,徐乙彤(Denise)聲稱沒人會在意這一點,您知道我的意思嗎?

In fact, at recording time 43:54 Denise makes the bold assertion that the Taiwan government will simply find a way to expel Rene from the country.

實際上,在記錄時間43:54,徐乙彤大膽斷言台灣政府將簡單地找到一種將瑞內(瑞內)驅逐出該國的方法。

Relevant public questions are "Why did the Tainan District government not inspect cram schools to ensure compliance with local safety regulations?  And, why did Tainan District Civil Court judge 羅郁棣 subsequently allow Kidsland managers to give false testimony in court to hide the fact that Kidsland intentionally circumvented the national safety regulations in case file 107年勞訴字第60?"  (Exhibit D002 and D009)

相關公眾問題是:台南區政府為什麼不檢查補習班,以確保遵守當地安全法規?為什麼台南區民事法院法官羅郁棣隨後允許凱仕蘭經理在法庭上提供虛假證詞,以掩蓋凱仕蘭有意為之的事實,案卷107年勞訴字第60號,違反了國家安全法規?(瑞內證D002D009號)

 

Additional references | 其他參考

Rene submitted the 28 Dec 2017 audio recording to the Tainan District Prosecutor's office, case file 107年度偵字第15047號案件.

瑞內向台南區檢察院提交了1061228日的錄音,案件107年度偵字第15047號。

At recording time 43:54, Denise (徐乙彤) contravened Taiwan Criminal Code 305 when she stated "the government will just let you leave."  Upon successful completion of any outstanding criminal allegations against the accused, Denise directly implied the meaning of "let" to be "force". 

在錄製時間43:54,徐乙彤(Denise)說“the‧government‧will‧just‧let‧you‧leave”,因而違反了台灣刑法典305。徐乙彤直接暗示了“let”成為迫使的含義。

The supervisor of the Kaohsiung City National Immigration Agency, Raymond, told Rene that the government will deport Rene if he is convicted of any crimes in Taiwan.  The conversation occurred on 5 Dec 2019.  Find Raymond's picture, a link to the voice recording of the conversation, and a link to a resulting request of Taiwan's administrative court, and a summary of 5 Dec 2019 in the PDF at:

高雄市移民局局長雷蒙德告訴雷內,若雷內在台灣被判有罪,政府將驅逐雷內。對話發生在108125日。在PDF中找到Raymond的照片、對話錄音的鏈接、台灣行政法院的請求鏈接以及2019125日的摘要:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/17PlSrGrCXwFrLCD-bVAOzb7qCTWfP8eW/view?usp=sharing

Denise threatened Rene.  In the context of this criminal allegation against Rene, Denise threatens Rene with deportation and insinuates that Taiwan prosecutors will prejudice Rene.  Taiwan prosecutors do because they refuse to investigate Kidsland's fraud (Exhibit D012) despite overwhelming evidence (D009).  Taiwan police did unlawfully deny Rene access to legal counsel on 7 May 2018 (D005 and D006), and the prosecutors did frivolously dismiss the complaint.  If the Taiwan court decides that Rene is guilty of slandering the school while Rene defends against Kidsland's obstruction of justice, Kaohsiung City National Immigration Agency's (NIA) supervisor Raymond (Rene can offer an audio recording) stated that NIA must deport Rene.

徐乙彤(Denise)威脅瑞內。在針對瑞內的刑事指控中,徐乙彤以驅逐出境威脅瑞內,並暗示台灣檢察官會損害瑞內。台灣檢察官之所以這樣做,是因為儘管有大量證據(瑞內證D009號),他們仍拒絕調查凱仕蘭的欺詐行為(瑞內證D012號)。台灣警方確實在10757日(瑞內證D004D005號)非法否認瑞內與律師接觸,檢察官毫不客氣地駁回了申訴。如果台灣法院裁定瑞內犯有誹謗學校罪,而瑞內則為反對凱仕蘭妨礙司法公正的行為辯護,則高雄市國家移民局(NIA)的主管Raymond(瑞內可以提供錄音)表示NIA必須驅逐出境瑞內。

New foreign teachers must submit two separate criminal record inspections upon their first work permit application in any municipality of Taiwan, according to 《台灣補習及進修教育法》第9

Under these circumstances, on 28 Dec 2017 Denise repeatedly made the false statement that Kidsland has the lawful ability to circumvent both the local and international criminal record check requirements. 

Denise affirms her threat at recording times 43:18 and 43:21 because Denise insists that no government official care about the fact that Kidsland intentionally circumvents Taiwan's criminal record check requirements for all teachers.

根據《台灣補習及進修教育法》第9條的規定,新來的外國教師在台灣任何一個城市申請首次工作許可時,必須分別進行兩次犯罪記錄檢查。

在這種情況下,1061228徐乙彤反復作出虛假的陳述,稱凱仕蘭具有規避本地和國際犯罪記錄檢查要求的合法能力。

徐乙彤在錄製時間43:1843:21肯定了她的威脅,因為徐乙彤堅持認為,政府官員並不關心凱仕蘭故意繞開台灣對所有教師的犯罪記錄檢查要求。

 

Next page: 下一頁:

2. "Rene insisted Kidsland share information about teachers to parents.  Some teachers look at parents like a game.  They talk with parents over LINE app for dates and sex."

2、「瑞內認為芝麻街凱仕蘭應該和家長分享老師的資訊,但有些老師和家長玩著某種遊戲,他們透過LINE和家長來約會和發生關係。」

http://reneguru.blogspot.com/2021/07/klss0002.html

List of Kidsland details including address and Chinese names of managers:

芝麻街凱仕蘭詳細信息列表,包括經理的地址和中文姓名:

http://p7.rene.guru

Back to the list of KLSS pages:

回到KLSS頁面列表:

http://p8.rene.guru

====

#rene.guru

End of page.  Comment on the Main Page:

http://p1.rene.guru

Journal Of A Schizophrenic, with a twist.

Friday, July 2, 2021

Criminal Perjury at CJCU (長榮大學) update 2 July 2021

TO: Alex Lee (李泳龍), President (校長)

_cjcu0002 | updated 25 July 2021, by Rene Helmerichs

Back to CJCU's List: http://p14.rene.guru



TO: Alex Lee (李泳龍), President (校長),

Chang Jung Christian University (長榮大學), Tainan City, Taiwan Province Of China

Reference http://p5.rene.guru to understand the specific legal reason why China still owns Taiwan.

至:台南市長榮大學

AKA: "Evergreen University", "Chang Da"

話:06-2785123

真:06-2785176

址:71101台南市歸仁區長大路1

RE: Criminal PERJURY

關於向台南地方法院提交的故意虛假交易文件:

南院武刑歲1081170字第1090042211

All referenced emails from Sally Wu (吳宜錚) are in the 25 June 2021 submission to Tainan District Prosecutors about the perjury:

吳宜錚的所有引用電子郵件都在2021625日提交給台南地區檢察官的關於偽證的提交中:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1TOmgIvbsQj353eh02k6P1fZavYVCRew5/view?usp=sharing

 

Hello Mr. Lee, 李泳龍, Alex if I may.

I'm exited to write you. 

I intended this to replace the page at http://p13.rene.guru

But I haven't heard from you.

Allow me to introduce Talk To Dream, so that you understand its scope.

Nine psychiatrists provided court documents testifying that I am severely mentally ill:

Schizophrenia, Delusional Disorder, severe and prolonged psychosis, Schizoaffective Disorder, Bipolar Disorder, manic and depressive, usually manic, Obsessive-Compulsive Personality Disorder.  They left out fud.

Recently, a tenth psychiatrist joined our story.  There have been ten doctors in the story, but only 9 psychiatrists who submitted documents in court about me.

In order of appearance in this story, the psychiatrists are (Canada CPSO#):

1. Ali, Liaqat (63312),

2. Chawla, Anjana (84905),

3. Lorberg, Gunter Wolfgang (72223),

4. Van Impe, Jeffrey John Howard (82520),

5. De Freitas, Karen Denise (71381),

6. Dickey, Robert Lee (32295),

7. Komer, William Joseph (55555),

8. Karagianis, James Leslie (80478),

and long wrong Wong,

9. Wong, Leslie Kin Long (86592)

The tenth is Taiwanese, met on 31 May 2021

10. 李俊宏, Lee Chun-Hung

I'll formally welcome him probably next week at http://p15.rene.guru

Remember, ALL psychiatrists receive certification approved by the American Psychological Association according to the teachings of their global bible, The Diagnostic And Statistics Manual, which is continually revised to keep the public guessing at the source of mental HEALTH.  (We understand that, BECAUSE Allah exists, the source is NOT a potion or pill).

We're all only ever advertising our personal beliefs.  So why can't we all work together? 

The bible encourages mutual church-building, right?  The part about "where any two agree, there in their midst is the spirit of wholeness".  Because there is only one whole, all parts are only learning to work better together.  Everyone implicitly serves the same underlying purpose, sustainability.

Alex, in the email containing the first draft of this, I forgot to mention, the whole reason everyone of those psychiatrists is against me is because there's something wrong with me, it's because I claimed to be the biblical Antichrist, as the cover of the first part of this story shows:

http://2019.talk2dream.com

It's VERY unlikely (emphasis on the UN) that I'm going to stop believing that about myself.  It began like a joke.  I figured, if the bible was written to everyone, then any one of us could stand up and say "Yeah, I'll be that guy."  Well, I guess the joke was on me.  The real question is "Would you want to be that guy, knowing that the guy in the bible has to give up his entire personal life in order to establish a new NO-PRIVACY-LAWS city?"

Well, I'm still that guy.  And, I definitely deserve A MENTAL ASSESSMENT.  Hence why I'm going after that 10th doctor PUBLICLY.  You guys, CJCU, Kidsland, and everybody else, you guys are just fluff to help fuel my fire.  Publicity ensures Honesty, and saves all of us timeHELP ME!!

You're either with me, or you're against me on this one.  Let's do this one in the name of the Spirit Of Christ.  And I do mean "You" as EVERYONE.

 

On 31 May 2021, in Taiwan, a psychiatrist refused to provide me with a mental assessment on grounds that I refused to accept that the brain thinks. 

Find confirmation from court in a document tracking a question about the doctor, a doctor who denied a severely mentally ill patient the right to a court-requested mental assessment:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1UB3LevcG-g1wDSdIBKPeRjZO4BZCtmlh/view?usp=sharing

What the doctor did is actually violates Criminal Code Article 294.  The law says:

If a person who by law, order, or contract has duty to support or protect a helpless person abandons him or does not give him support or protection necessary to preserve his life, the person shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than six months but not more than five years.

And, on that note, I finally found what I need in order to begin criminal investigations against prosecutors who refuse to investigate the three lying cram school managers.  It's Article 125, item 3.  The cram school committed criminal fraud, details at http://p8.rene.guru

Here's my reasoning:

If our thinking comes from our physical brain THEN a scan of the brain can help assess problems related to thinking. 

BUT our thinking comes from SPIRIT.  Spirit is eternal, and only momentarily with our body.  It uses the body like a tool, to learn about itself, and make a "live-action" movie.

THEREFORE a scan of our physical brain is completely irrelevant to an assessment of mental health. 

Since I am publicly testifying that GOD is the keeper of mental health (that we are all collectively GOD, not that God is just one person), therefore, I must correct the mistaken belief in magic.  A "belief in magic" is exactly what the psychiatrist teaches when the psychiatrist says:

You need this pill in order to think correctly.  God doesn't exist.  Medical experts put a lot of thought into this pill.  If you eat the pill, you will understand things correctly.  This is the right pill.  It will help you.  And if it doesn't solve inconsistent thinking, then we'll try a different pill.  We'll find the right one, eventually.  I'm offering you a special discount.  Don't worry, it's not addictive.  Just take this pill until you get better, and remember, you NEED this pill in order to think correctly.

After that, I started the website at http://rene.guru in order to sort out my thinking, and share my situation with everyone:

FOR THE LAST SIX MONTHS, CHANG JUNG CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY incorrectly confirmed to prosecutors of the Tainan District Court (court file is listed at the top) that I am extorting money from a cram school.  The translator falsely confirmed that I am blackmailing the cram school to stop advertising this story. 

I NEED advertisement TO FIX this.  So why would I blackmail anyone?

Unfortunately, cram school managers also accuse me of being "delusional", so who's going to believe me?

No one believes me.

So I now I'm trying God, again.  Your God, Alex.  Not mine, since mine is clearly "not strong enough".  Thank you for that, by the way. 

I am calling out: "Holy Spirit, Our Father In Heaven, Jesus Christ in your name I ask!  Please help me to fix the incorrect translations from a university that claims to serve you and which doesn't seem to care that a translator is falsely accusing me of crime!"

And, do you know what? 

I'm directly asking CJCU to settle this matter with me before we escalate the issue in court.  Consider this message a public notice:

Chang Jung Christian University (長榮大學) Department Of Translation Studies (翻譯學系) Professor Sally Wu (吳宜錚) submitted false translations of substantial statements to the Tainan District Court.  PLEASE TAKE BACK ALL MESSAGES ABOUT ME. 

Both Sally Wu (吳宜錚) and Assistant Manager (助理管理師) Kai-Hui Chen (陳凱惠) confirmed submitting multiple translations beginning in December 2020, over multiple months, to Tainan District Court file:

南院武刑歲1081170字第1090042211

I'm directly asking Chang Jung Christian University (長榮大學) President (校長) Alex Lee (李泳龍) to ensure all translations from the school about me (Rene Helmerichs) are immediately withdrawn from the court.  Not just some statements, but ALL statements. 

And, because CJCU is supposed to be a CHRISTIAN school, I'm asking in the name of Jesus Christ, The Holy Spirit, Our loving Father in Heaven, GOD ALMIGHTY, and all public media outlets everywhere.  Spread the word!  Share the news!  Forward the link to this page which you are currently reading:

http://reneguru.blogspot.com/2021/07/cjcu0002.html

Or share the link to the previous page:

http://p13.rene.guru

Do we agree the purpose is always to save the court time, and never to waste it?

 

The English statement, translated by Chang Jung Christian University

I wrote the original English statement in an email to cram school managers dated 16 Oct 2018:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1NVqBbfb3JXVHk89byCUZaPSUWwwU5Jxo/view?usp=sharing

Let's call it Statement 2A.

2a、「nt$250‧buys‧me‧1000‧pieces‧of‧paper‧with‧a‧QR‧code‧and‧pictures‧of‧your‧clients.

Statement 2A means:

"I can spend 250nt$ to buy 1000 flyers, since the cost to print 1000 A5-sized black-and-white copies is only 250nt$ (about 9 USD) in Taiwan."

There are two A5 flyers on one A4-sized page.  The printing cost of each A4 paper is 0.5nt$.  Flyers can contain any information.  For example, a general picture of a university campus with QR Code conveniently assisting recipients to find a website containing more detail about the university's crimes.

Google Translate translates the meaning of 2A as:

“我可以花250新台幣買1000張傳單,因為在台灣打印1000A5大小的黑白副本的成本僅為250新台幣(約9美元)。”

在一張A4大小的頁面上有兩張A5傳單。每張A4紙的印刷成本為0.5nt$。傳單可以包含任何信息。例如,帶有QR碼的大學校園全景圖可以方便地幫助接收者找到包含有關大學犯罪的更多詳細信息的網站。

Google doesn't translate Statement 2A very well because Google Translate expects the "nt$" to come after the numerical amount, as it would if it were spoken.  But in English writing, the dollar sign comes before the number. 

The grammar, however, is correct.  My English statement contains zero grammatical flaws.  CJCU professor Sally Wu (吳宜錚) also placed the "nt$" in front of the number when she wrote "NT$1,500 for 1,500 English words" in an email dated 22 June 2021 at 3:39 PM.

We can replace "nt$" with TWD to help Google Translate:

Statement 2A becomes:

7aTWD250 buys me 1000 pieces of paper with a QR code and pictures of your clients.

Google translates Statement 2A with "TWD" instead of "nt$" as:

7bTWD250給我買了1000張帶有二維碼和客戶照片的紙。

 

The first paid translation provided by Chang Jung Christian University

Chang Jung Christian University professor Sally Wu (吳宜錚) translated Statement 2A as:

5、「(至林義德:)台幣250元跟我買1000張有QRcode和你客戶的照片。」

Assistant Manager (助理管理師) Kai-Hui Chen (陳凱惠) submitted Statement 5 to the Tainan District Court in a letter dated 9 Dec 2020 with Chang Jung Christian University ( --> 長大) file number長大翻譯字第1090016958號」:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/15mE4kznPR0m5JiYkl1zZBq9ai3luodM1/view?usp=sharing

On 22 June 2021 at 5:40 PM, Sally Wu (吳宜錚) wrote:

It (Statement 5) means

(You, Yi-De Lin MUST) Give me NT250 to buy 1,000 pieces of paper with QR code and client's photos.

She capitalized the "G" of "Give" in her email, but in the original December 2020 court submission, she implied that I am specifically demanding money from the owner the 13 Sesame Street cram schools.  That's what the prosecutors are using to convict me of extortion and blackmail!  Otherwise, the prosecutors have no evidence because no extortion occurred! 

(Remember, I NEED advertisement.  Why would I risk going to jail to stop someone from advertising?  That makes no sense!)

Find the email in the 25 June 2021 submission to Tainan District Prosecutors, a PDF copy is linked.  The email is on page 20:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1TOmgIvbsQj353eh02k6P1fZavYVCRew5/view?usp=sharing

 

The second paid translation provided by Chang Jung Christian University

We want to make sure that Sally understands her mistake. 

On 21 June 2021, I contacted Department Of Translation Studies (翻譯學系) Assistant Manager Kai-Hui Chen (陳凱惠) and began a second paid contract with Chang Jung Christian University (長榮大學).

Kai-Hui Chen (陳凱惠) chose the translator.

On 21 June 2021 at 3:55, Chang Jung Christian University professor Sally Wu (吳宜錚) contacted me:

Dear Rene

I am Sally Wu, a translator introduced by CJCU. I can work on your case and the fee is NT$1500. Let me know whether you will accept the fee. Tks a lot.

I wanted to make sure that Sally (吳宜錚) translates Statement 2A accurately.  That means, I had to teach her what I wanted her to say.  In other words, I literally taught her how to translate my statement.  That's really not a compliment to the Chang Jung Department Of Translation Studies.

On 22 June 2021 at 2:49 PM, I wrote to Sally:

Hi Sally,

I'd like to keep our work as simple as possible, if that's ok?

I want to confirm our agreement before I send the document:

1500NT$ buys me one Chinese translation of a document with up to 1500 English words, correct?

I want to make sure that you're not going to argue with me when I happily provide 1500NT$ to translate less than 1500 English words into Chinese.

I wasn't sure if Sally understood the entire contents, but she confirmed understanding the general meaning of the English phrase "buys me".  She replied on 22 June 2021 at 3:39 PM:

Dear Rene,

Yes, that's correct, NT$1,500 for 1,500 English words.

In later emails we confirmed the "up to" part.  Namely: if I only send Sally a total of 30 words (in two short sentences), then I am still obligated to pay CJCU 1500NT$.  She agreed, and I did pay.

I emailed Sally (吳宜錚) the two statements on 22 June 2021, at 4:05 PM:

I need only two statements translated.

Please translate and return in this email.

This is all I need:

1. Money provides me the ability to buy fliers at a print shop.

2. nt$250 buys me 1000 pieces of paper with a QR code and pictures of your clients.

Remember, this is the same translator who submitted the Statement 5 to the Tainan District Court in a letter dated 9 Dec 2020:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/15mE4kznPR0m5JiYkl1zZBq9ai3luodM1/view?usp=sharing

Sally replied on 22 June 2021 at 4:29 PM:

Dear Rene

Here you go. The word count for these two is 30.

Thank you.

1. Money provides me the ability to buy fliers at a print shop.

錢讓我可以在影印店買濾網

2. nt$250 buys me 1000 pieces of paper with a QR code and pictures of your clients.

NT$250可以讓我買1000張上方印有QR Code的紙和你客戶的照片

I wanted to confirm the meeting of the second statement.  I asked if her statement 2 meant the same as Statement 5.  On 22 June 2021 (most of this happened on 22 June) at 5:28 PM, I asked Sally (吳宜錚):

Does

(5) 台幣250元跟我買1000張有QR code和你客戶的照片。

mean that I can go to the print shop (or go somewhere--the name of the place doesn't need to be mentioned), and buy as many fliers (advertisements, pieces of paper) as long as I have enough money?

That's when Sally (吳宜錚) answered "No" and told me what Statement 5 means (it's quoted above).

She added that her second statement means:

NT$250 allows me to buy 1,000 pieces of paper printed with QR code and photos of your clients.

 

Is this a mistake?

I couldn't believe that the same translator just translated the same English statement two different ways.  So I asked the Assistant Manager Kai-Hui Chen (陳凱惠).   Kai-Hui confirmed that the same translator translated Statement 2A in December 2020 and in June 2021, and that translator was Sally Wu.

On 22 June 2021 at 6:55 PM, Sally wrote:

My name is Sally Wu (吳宜錚). I am an Assistant Professor at 長榮大學翻譯學系。 Today's date is 22 June 2021 (Taiwan year 110). I confirm and validate the English statement

我是吳宜錚,我是長榮大學翻譯學系的助理教授。今天是2021622(中華民國110)。我在此確認此英文句子:

2a、「nt$250buysme1000piecesofpaperwithaQRcodeandpicturesofyourclients.

means

意思為:

2b、「NT$250可以讓我列印1000張上方有QR Code你客戶照片的紙。」

The English statement does NOT mean:

英文陳述之意不是:

5"台幣250元跟我買1000張有QRcode和你客戶的照片。"

The English statement also does not mean:

此英文句子之意也不是:

6"你要以一張台幣250元,一共1000,跟我買上面印有QRcode和有你們客戶肖像的傳單。"

 

The Question of Intent

A reader left a comment on the Welcome page to CJCU, http://p13.rene.guru

Are you sure the translator you mentioned is qualified enough to be a court translator and also an expert?

There are two replies on 2 July 2021:

pretty sure:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1umnB4npP2iqyXh3rPbcLM0nzrwUrI5O2/view?usp=sharing

Here's a short-hand, in case the link isn't clickable:

http://sally.talk2dream.com

The document at the link provides extensive information about Sally.  Apparently she's been a court-appointed translator over 10 years, and she's led a number of class, or courses, about translation and ethics, to senior court officials!

The real question is of intent:

Did Sally Wu intend to submit a false translation to the court?

Obviously, a professor doesn't want to risk losing their job by committing intentional perjury.  But perjury which is "not" intentional IS intention IF the professor insists on keeping the knowingly false translation in court.

For that reason, I specifically informed the translator that her translations are inconsistent.  And I specifically asked the translator to help me cancel the error. 

I need the university to withdrawal all translations that it provided the court about me.  Not some translations but all translations because I can't be certain of the quality of the translations until I personally verify them.  It's important that I personally verify every translation from a university which previously submitted false translations.

Here's what Sally wrote on 24 June 2021 at 6:04 AM:

Dear Rene

Please understand that I did my best to translate according to the context and there is more than one translation submitted to the court (according to the court paper). I submitted my expert opinion towards emails you sent to some managers of the cram school and the court made decision about who to trust. I had and have no control over this part and I am sorry to know this ruling result. If you need me to refund your NT$1,500, just let me know. I have no other things to say and if you think I shall be fully responsible for your ruling, you can take me to the court. Follow the normal procedure to file your complaints as I told my university.

Sally is UNWILLING to admit to her mistake AND she's willing to allow the court to decide that I am guilty of criminal extortion (Blackmail) on the basis of her false verification of an original false translation from a fraudulent cram school.

THEREFORE, she declares WAR on ME, not vice versa.  Make sure you understand that, Alex.

This began with a translation from Kidsland Sesame Street (芝麻街凱仕蘭) senior managers.

Find information about Kidsland at http://p7.rene.guru

I sincerely believe that Kidsland senior managers Clare (江佩樺), Denise (徐乙彤), and Stacy (黃姿瑜) deliberately submitted an incorrect translation of Statement 2A to the prosecutors to distract prosecutors from beginning proceedings of criminal fraud against the school.

A description of Criminal Fraud at Kidsland Sesame Street (芝麻街凱仕蘭) is generally described at http://p8.rene.guru

I'm continuing to develop that argument until they decide to partner with us, of course.  Since, in the end, we're all going to agree to working together to support the SAME SUSTAINABLE ENVIRONMENT.  We only have one of those, after all.  And our personal beliefs about God really don't matter.  Thereafter, I'll go after the tenth psychiatrist.

I've add links to documents able to support the allegation, since the managers previously gave false statements in court to hide their criminal fraud on p8.

The managers claim my Statement 2A means:

6"你要以一張台幣250元,一共1000,跟我買上面印有QRcode和有你們客戶肖像的傳單。"

Google translates Chinese statement (6) as:

6bNT$250 each piece, 1000 pieces in total, buy flyers from me.

Remember that the original statement is from a polite warning to the managers emailed on 16 Oct 2018:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1NVqBbfb3JXVHk89byCUZaPSUWwwU5Jxo/view?usp=sharing

The warning wasn't only to the managers, it was to the ENTIRE management. 

The email was addressed to Yide Lin, 林義德.  That guy owns 13 Sesame Street branches, as well as a large maternity hospital, and a few other businesses in Tainan City.  He's undoubtedly well-connected in a country that was a dictatorship until 1987.  林義德 is about 70 years ago.  He's old school, i.e., probably willing to provide "extras" to the most senior court officials, in ways that none of us would ever be able to track.  Remember, Taiwan island also contains a lot of organized crime.

So, really, the ONLY hope I have of not being convicted is to ADVERTISE.  I figure "publicity ensures consistency", and, as long as I'm always striving to be "not mutually exclusive", I've got to end up with a legal argument to rule the world, like, slap the elite council of super-gods-on-earth upside the head with a ruler.

And that means, Mr. Alex Lee (李泳龍), President (校長), Chang Jung Christian University (長榮大學), Taiwan Province of CHINA (中國台灣省)

Please DO reference exactly WHY Taiwan DOES belong to CHINA at:

http://p5.rene.guru

AND REALIZE

THAT

IF I am convicted OF a criminal offence IN Taiwan, I MUST leave Taiwan according to statements from a "Raymond", spoken to me on 5 Dec 2019 at the Kaohsiung City National Immigration Agency... Reference this PDF about that, with a link to a voice recording, pictures, etc:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/17PlSrGrCXwFrLCD-bVAOzb7qCTWfP8eW/view?usp=sharing

AND if I LEAVE Taiwan, I'm going to China and convincing them to begin international ligigation against ongoing corruption in Taiwan, corruption which I can prove exists at the local level (because the contents of http://p8.rene.guru are still not being investigated DESPITE BEING MY LEGAL DEFENCE AGAINST THE ALLEGIONS OF LIBEL AGAINST ME)

and...

well...

like that 16 Oct 2018 email said:

While we argue about working together... more and more government people will take notice and help you to stop your nonsense.  At that point, you will be broken.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1NVqBbfb3JXVHk89byCUZaPSUWwwU5Jxo/view?usp=sharing

 

On 24 June 2021 at 6:04 AM, Sally wrote:

Dear Rene

Please understand that I did my best to translate according to the CONTEXT...

 

PLEASE ENSURE YOU, ALEX, UNDERSTAND THE CONTEXT.

If we're arguing about working together, then we're not working together are we?

And IF you're not willing to testify in court of law that you represent THE SAME GOD that I represent, THE GOD THAT GOVERNS OUR COLLECTIVE MENTAL HEALTH, then I suggest you decide, rather expeditiously, to contact the Tainan District Court and remove all translations which CJCU submitted about me.  ALL OF THEM.  The court file number is at the top.

I'll ask about that in court on 13 July 2021. 

IF THE COURT DOES NOT CONFIRM THAT CJCU WITHDREW ALL TRANSLATIONS ABOUT ME, I'll appeal any conviction, of course, and begin Civil Proceedings against you, and CJCU, following this very public message directly AT

http://cjcu.talk2dream.com

Criminal Perjury at CJCU (長榮大學) update 2 July 2021

TO: Alex Lee (李泳龍), President (校長)

 

Lastly, in the event you want to begin Republic Of CHINA Criminal Code Article 310 allegations of libel against me, Rene Helmerichs(中華民國:是瑞內) on grounds of the current content at http://p13.rene.guru , I've preserved a printable PDF copy (with the noted reply, and link to Sally Wu's profile) at:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1hb2CmUCdb5tP9XxqTs75SRfUMEsCDWZh/view?usp=sharing

Use that copy if you want to file with the prosecutors, since the link to http://sally.talk2dream.com alongside this document is also automatically MY defence. 

This is Alex Lee:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1S7pQPFYVeZs7RAz864ejJcc905S0mkNX/view?usp=sharing

Live at:

http://reneguru.blogspot.com/2021/07/TCTL0001.html

See how easily misunderstandings can happen?

That whole time we were STILL talking about just WHAT a misunderstanding actually IS:

Are you ready yet to help Me save the world?

====

#rene.guru

End of page.  Comment on the Main Page:

http://p1.rene.guru

Journal Of A Schizophrenic, with a twist of mental order.

Civil Lawsuit against three Taiwan Criminal Court Judges

我今天起訴了台灣刑事法院的三位法官。 _zhou0001 | dated 28 July 2021, by Rene Helmerichs PDF: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1sXAFBnYGTcy9SYW65ExId-b6Gn9O55BV...