Sunday, June 20, 2021

Question 2 to Taiwan's Legal Aid Foundation, 問題二於台南市法律扶助基金會

Question 2, 20 June 2021: Can you please inform the Tainan District Criminal Court that I cannot continue to allow Lawyer Scott Lin (林泓帆) to represent me in court if the lawyer is not able to ensure that I receive an assessment of my mental health?

110620日,問題2:能否告知台南區刑事法院,如果律師不能確保我接受心理健康評估,我不能繼續讓林泓帆律師代表我出庭?

_tlaf0002 | emailed 20 June 2021, by Rene Helmerichs

Two headings:

1. Request grounds

2. Attachments

兩個標題:

1)理由很簡單

2)附件

 

For your convenience, this public document includes clickable links which you can reach from any phone using the attached QR Code, or directly at:

為方便起見,此公開文檔包含可點擊的鏈接,您可以使用隨附的二維碼從任何電話進入,或直接進入:

http://reneguru.blogspot.com/2021/06/tlaf0002.html

 

1. Request grounds

1)理由很簡單

VIP Education Group managers allege my statement "Kidsland Sesame Street hires teachers who suffer from mentally illness" is a false statement.

人上人教育事業集團經理聲稱我的聲明凱仕蘭聘請患有精神疾病的老師是虛假陳述。

The managers went to the police, the police forwarded the complaint to the prosecutors, and the prosecutors began criminal proceedings.

管理人員報了警,警方將投訴轉交給了檢察官,檢察官開始了刑事訴訟。

In criminal court, I am presumed innocent.  Yet, in a phone call from 21 Jan 2018, the General Manager Clare Chiang (江佩樺) told my wife that one of the parents of one of the students in my class is a psychiatrist, and that psychiatrist thinks that I have a mental illness.  The conversation was in Mandarin.  Here's a recording of the call:

在刑事法庭上,我被推定精神正常。然而,在107121日的電話中,總經理江佩樺告訴我的妻子,我班一個學生的父母之一是精神科醫生,那位精神科醫生認為我有精神疾病。談話是用普通話進行的。以下是通話錄音:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1IWS12FoyR3fJwSP8cR4LAoW1A6YDhxLU/view?usp=sharing

Therefore, I must have the opportunity to prove that I indeed suffer from a mental illness (according to all common definitions of the general idea).

因此,我必須有機會證明我確實患有精神疾病(根據一般概念的所有常見定義)。

It's my understanding that the court must help me to receive an honest, fair, and impartial assessment of my mental health (or "illness", as is the case), otherwise, of course, the general manager directly allowed criminal character defamation to continue about me (her clients share a common LINE group and collectively discuss and propagate defame about me) and the prosecutors are allowing the crime to continue.

我的理解是,法院必須幫助我對我的心理健康(或疾病,視情況而定)進行誠實、公平和公正的評估,否則,當然,總經理直接被允許繼續進行關於我犯罪人格的誹謗(她的客戶共享一個共同的LINE群組並集體討論和傳播關於我的誹謗),而檢察官允許犯罪繼續進行。

I believe it's a crime (Taiwan Criminal Code Article 310) of general manager of a large cram school to publicly destroy my reputation with an allegation of mental illness if no mental illness exists.  And Taiwan prosecutors discriminate against me if they allow the character defamation to continue without allowing me the ability to prove the allegation is false.  This obligates the court to order an assessment of my mental health from a credible authority since a Schizophrenic individual is potentially of serious harm to others, and should be identified and treated right away in order to prevent harm to the general population.  The allegation is proved false if psychiatrists cannot lawfully assess me, since the presumption of innocence includes the presumption that a person does not have a mental illness until a recognized authority makes the diagnosis.  In this case, the general manager said that a recognized authority did make the diagnosis, so we just need to find out who that was, and what exactly the diagnosis was, and why.

我認為,如果沒有精神疾病,大型補習班的總經理以精神疾病的指控公開破壞我的聲譽是一種犯罪(台灣刑法第310條)。如果台灣檢方允許繼續誹謗人格,而不允許我證明指控是虛假的,他們就會歧視我。由於精神分裂症患者可能對其他人造成嚴重傷害,因此法院有義務命令權威機構對我的心理健康進行評估,應立即識別和治療,以防止對普通人群造成傷害。如果精神科醫生不能合法地評估我,則該指控被證明是錯誤的,因為無罪推定包括在公認的權威做出診斷之前推定一個人沒有精神疾病。在這種情況下,總經理說了確實有公認的權威做出了診斷,所以我們只需要找出那是誰,到底診斷了什麼,以及為什麼。

Additionally, nine previous psychiatrists all declared me to be suffering from multiple mental disorders including, but not limited to: Schizophrenia, Schizoaffective Disorder, Delusional Disorder, severe Psychosis, extreme Bipolar Disorder (Mania and Depression), OCD, and OCPD:

此外,之前的九位精神科醫生都宣布我患有多種精神障礙,包括但不限於:精神分裂症、分裂情感障礙、妄想症、重度精神病、極度雙相情感障礙(躁狂症和抑鬱症)、強迫症、和強迫性人格障礙:

http://2019.talk2dream.com

On two occasions (separated by a period of three years, in 2012 and 2015), psychiatrists declared me mentally so exaggeratingly incompetent that I required forced medication (being strapped down and forcibly injected, and then not allowed to leave because they quite literally owned my body) in order to regain my senses before the court judge allowed a criminal case to continue.

有兩次(間隔三年,分別是101年和104年),精神科醫生誇大了我精神上的無能,以至於我需要強制服藥(被綁起來強行注射,然後不允許離開,因為他們確實擁有我的身體),以便在法庭法官允許刑事案件繼續審理之前恢復我的理智。

The current criminal lawsuit allegations began in 2018.  That's again three years after the last time the disease came back. 

當前的刑事訴訟指控始於107年。 那是在上一次疾病復發的三年後。

Psychiatrists also wrote that, without continual medication, my condition would only deteriorate.  In fact, in Canada they considered me so severely mentally ill that they gave me a permanent disability pension and told me that I'm too ill to work, even if I take the medication.  That's why I fled to Taiwan and began asking people to help me fix Canada's craziness.

精神科醫生還寫道,如果沒有持續用藥,我的病情只會惡化。事實上,在加拿大,他們認為我患有嚴重的精神疾病,以至於他們給了我永久性殘疾撫卹金,並告訴我即使我接受藥物,我也病得不能工作。這就是為什麼我逃到台灣並開始請求人們幫助我解決加拿大的瘋狂問題。

I happily tell you that I have been medication-free the whole time in Taiwan!  Well, almost, but no drugs from doctors.  Hurray! 

我很高興地告訴你,我在台灣一直沒有服用藥物!嗯,幾乎,但沒有醫生開的藥。歡呼!

So, maybe, just maybe, the doctors were correct and my Schizophrenia has returned with all of the horrible and socially dangerous side effects!  We can't really be certain unless we have that court-ordered assessment of my mental health, right?

所以,也許,只是也許,醫生是對的,我的精神分裂症又回來了,帶來了所有可怕的、危害社會的副作用!除非我們對我的心理健康進行法院命令的評估,否則我們無法確定,對嗎?

Let's get that done.  We care about the public safety, after all.

讓我們完成它。畢竟,我們關心公共安全。

If Lawyer Scott Lin (林泓帆), whom I love very much, cannot ensures that I receive a copy of an honest assessment of mental health, from a reputable authority of mental health and illness, more than from testimony of a general manager who insists that I acted "strangely", without "understanding" and like a mentally ill person, then I cannot continue to allow Lawyer Scott Lin (林泓帆) to represent me in court.  It's really that simple. 

如果我深愛的林泓帆律師不能確保我收到一份來自有信譽的心理健康和疾病權威的誠實的心理健康評估副本,而是來自於總經理堅持認為的證詞說我的行為奇怪,沒有去理解,並且像個精神病患一樣,那麼我不能再讓林泓帆律師代表我出庭了。真的就是這麼簡單。

Should you prefer to scan a QR Code to read this message online, and click the link directly, attached is a QR Code to this page, tlaf0002.

如果您更喜歡掃描二維碼在線閱讀此消息,並直接單擊鏈接,此頁面隨附二維碼,tlaf0002

Sincerely, 真摯地,

 

Rene Helmerichs

(中華民國:是瑞內)

20 June 2021

 

2. Attachments| 附件

tlaf0002_QR_20210620.png

 

Previous Question tlaf0001, Question 1, 問題一

http://reneguru.blogspot.com/2021/06/tlaf0001.html

====

#rene.guru

End of page.  Comment on the Main Page:

http://p1.rene.guru

Journal Of A Schizophrenic, with a twist.

Saturday, June 19, 2021

Criminal perjury of three Kidsland managers on 26 Nov 2018

Criminal perjury of three Kidsland managers on 26 Nov 2018

中华民国1071126日三名凱仕蘭經理的刑事偽證

_tpro0001 | updated 25 July 2021, by Rene Helmerichs

TPRO Pages: http://p12.rene.guru


http://reneguru.blogspot.com/2021/06/tpro0001.html

Purpose (does what?)

Tracks complaint of Kidsland's Criminal perjury. 

The intentional deceit began on 20 Jan 2018.  I received notice of intention of the deceit from Kidsland on 28 Dec 2017.

Goal (goes where?)

Ensures I remember to follow this one up.  Either we're a team, or Taiwan is corrupt.

 

03

2021 July 23, update with evidence:

PDF: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1vb59TuptmoRxA4B9gXIfGLQ_Ht3dtMox/view?usp=sharing

Web: http://reneguru.blogspot.com/2021/07/klss0015.html

02

2021 June 25, initial perjury filing without evidence (just to get a case number):

PDF: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1fUQnarwFPoV8azKqaOV2jsIcorz3l8fM/view?usp=sharing

01

First complaints

I began complaining about the requested deception when I became aware of it on 28 Dec 2017.

I've since submitted complaints to the Tainan District Prosecutor's Office, to Taiwan Legal Aid Foundation, to lawyers, to police stations, and to government offices via email submissions.  They've fallen on deaf ears.  Now I'm keeping track.

The 7 June 2021 is a reduction from a 21 May 2021 application to the Tainan District Criminal Court:

PDF: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1KWqnM4K8du5plckVMJmBZzy-G-0BCUwL/view?usp=sharing

The judge's 28 May 2021 reply, and my 7 June 2021 response to his reply, is included in the following 20-page PDF:

PDF: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1QdL0jhw3Nbp7L0_63x9w4zJVvNo5JZsE/view?usp=sharing

The Tainan District Judge who allowed the perjury is Yuqi Luo (羅郁棣).  I wrote and filed a Civil lawsuit against the judge on 28 March 2019, but the court asked me to pay NT$17,000 (about $600 USD).  I figured I'd probably lose the suit because corruption has a habit of sticking together, but it was filed.  It's not very refined, but it stores information orderly.  Here's a PDF:

PDF: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1PozlpbNM2bXB__W7TElCt7pEV-HGdWD3/view?usp=sharing

CC: http://luo.talk2dream.com

Judge Yuqi Luo (羅郁棣) is now also my witness in a related Civil lawsuit.  This lawsuit was filed 23 July 2021, and is refined.  As far as I know, it's actually perfect (the defendant has no defence):

Web: http://reneguru.blogspot.com/2021/07/cict0002.html

PDF: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1vBJn0UPacV8tiZpZzCZWh3bXHJJk9cyF/view?usp=sharing

 

Back to TPRO Pages: http://p12.rene.guru

====

#rene.guru

End of page.  Comment on the Main Page:

http://p1.rene.guru

Journal Of A Schizophrenic, with a twist of mental order.

Friday, June 18, 2021

Question 1 to Taiwan's Legal Aid Foundation, 問題一於台南市法律扶助基金會

Question 1, 18 June 2021: What do I need to submit to the Tainan District Criminal Court in order to receive an assessment of mental health before the judge punishes me for a crime I didn't commit?

110618日,問題1:我需要向台南地區刑事法院提交什麼才能在法官因我沒有犯下的罪行懲罰我之前接受心理健康評估?

_tlaf0001 | emailed 19 June 2021, by Rene Helmerichs

Dark Red text indicates content not included in the original email sent 18 June 2021.

深紅色文字表示110618日發送的原始電子郵件中未包含的內容。

Four headings:

1. Please help me communicate to LAF Lawyer Scott Lin (林泓帆)

2. My Schizophrenia: Delusional Disorder + Disorganized Thinking

3. Taiwan Psychiatrist Chun-Hong Lee (李俊宏) illegally denies court request

4. Attachments

四個標題:

1)請幫我聯繫法律扶助基金會律師林泓帆

2)我的精神分裂症妄想症+思維混亂

3)台灣精神科醫生李俊宏非法拒絕法庭請求

4)附件

 

For your convenience, this public document includes clickable links which you can reach from any phone using the attached QR Code, or directly at:

為方便起見,此公開文檔包含可點擊的鏈接,您可以使用隨附的二維碼從任何電話進入,或直接進入:

http://reneguru.blogspot.com/2021/06/tlaf0001.html

This message only appears long because a Chinese translation accompanies the English.  In actuality, it is much shorter.  I am writing this because I am in a severe state of mental distress!  In fact, because I am truly in a severe state of mental depression, or just Schizophrenic, I have started a new website to keep track of ongoing abuse and discrimination against me from government officials in Taiwan:

這條消息之所以會顯得很長,是因為英文隨附了中文翻譯。實際上,它要短得多。我寫這篇文章是因為我處於嚴重的精神壓力狀態!事實上,因為我真的處於嚴重的精神抑鬱狀態,或者只是精神分裂症,我開設了一個新網站,以追踪台灣政府官員對我的持續虐待和歧視:

http://rene.guru

I need help to ensure that I receive an assessment of mental health before the Tainan District Criminal Court sentences me.

我需要幫助以確保在台南地區刑事法院對我判刑之前接受心理健康評估。

 

1. Please help me communicate to LAF Lawyer Scott Lin (林泓帆)

1)請幫我聯繫法律扶助基金會律師林泓帆

Either I don't understand how my lawyer is helping, or my lawyer isn't helping.

要麼我不明白我的律師是如何提供幫助的,要麼我的律師沒有提供幫助。

My lawyer is Scott Lin, 林泓帆.  I love my lawyer, but I'm not sure if he is honestly explaining the situation to the Tainan District Criminal Court.  I don't think he's submitted anything to the court which explains:

我的律師是林Scott‧Lin。我愛我的律師,但我不確定他是否誠實地向台南地區刑事法院解釋了情況。我認為他沒有向法院提交任何解釋:

1) Three cram school managers lied to the court about knowing I had a serious mental health and criminal history before the school hired me as a teacher.  The three managers claimed they didn't know. 

1、三名補習班經理向法庭謊稱知道我在學校聘請我為老師之前就知道我有嚴重的心理健康和犯罪史。三位經理聲稱他們不知道。

2) The managers told me to stay alone with kindergarten students overnight in a hotel on a school trip 14 Aug 2017.  This violates every statute protecting the care and safety of children.  The statutes prevented the school from lawfully hiring me as a teacher because I was diagnosed with severe mental illnesses including Schizophrenia, Schizoaffective Disorder, Delusional Disorder, Psychosis, Bipolar Disorder, and Obsessive-Compulsive Personality Disorder ("Love obsession").  The managers knew psychiatrists kept me imprisoned in a mental hospital almost three years.  My wife was at the meeting.  We told the managers together, and then they hired me.

2、管理人員告訴我106814日在學校旅行中與幼兒園學生單獨在酒店過夜。這違反了保護兒童護理和安全的所有法規。法規禁止學校合法聘用我擔任教師,因為我被診斷出患有精神分裂症、分裂情感障礙、妄想症、精神病、雙相情感障礙和強迫性人格障礙等嚴重精神疾病。經理們知道精神科醫生把我關在精神病院將近三年。我的妻子參加了會議。我們一起告訴了經理,然後他們僱用了我。

3) The managers claim a lawful teaching contract existed when in fact they had no intention to follow the law from the start, and therefore no lawful teaching contract ever existed. 

3、管理人員聲稱存在合法的教學合同,而實際上他們從一開始就無意遵守法律,因此不存在合法的教學合同。

4) The managers are now intentionally making false Chinese translations of a harmless English statement to accuse me of even more serious crimes, crimes which never occurred, but which everyone believes because no one believes that the translation is wrong!  (I really think we should just use news companies about that.  That helps me advertise this case, and it helps the justice system of Taiwan ensure honesty!)

4、經理們現在故意把一份無害的英文聲明進行錯誤的中文翻譯,指控我犯下了更嚴重的罪行,那些從未發生過但每個人都相信的罪行,因為沒有人認為翻譯是錯誤的!(我真的認為我們應該使用新聞公司。這有助於我宣傳此案,也有助於台灣司法系統確保誠實!)

5) It wasn't my fault that the psychiatrist didn't complete the court-requested mental assessment on 31 May 2021.

5、精神科醫生沒有在110531日完成法院要求的心理評估,這不是我的錯。

6) We need an assessment of mental health before the judge sentences me for crimes which I didn't commit anyway!

6、在法官判我犯下我沒有犯下的罪行之前,我們需要對心理健康進行評估!

7) We need a criminal investigation of the false statements which three cram school managers spoke in Civil Court on 26 Nov 2018 (see attached!):

7、我們需要對三名補習班經理於20181126日在民事法庭上發表的虛假陳述進行刑事調查(見附件!):

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1tRgTC0vii0xgPb2nwSgxovxW0Aq5YPCr/view?usp=sharing

8) I gave a complete set of all evidence to establish every allegedly false statement as a true statement to the court on 29 April 2020.  So far, the court has entirely ignored the evidence.  No criminal investigation occurred about the truth of (the content of) any of the allegedly false statements.  Why is there no criminal investigation to establish that the three managers are lying to the court and prosecutors?  WHY WHY WHY?  Find the 29 April 2020 submission at:

8)我於109429日向法院提供了完整的所有證據,以證明每一個涉嫌虛假陳述都是真實陳述。到目前為止,法院完全忽略了這些證據。沒有對任何涉嫌虛假陳述的真實性進行刑事調查。為什麼沒有刑事調查來確定這三名經理向法院和檢察官撒謊?為什麼為什麼為什麼?查找109429日提交的內容:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/16r9SqfJRPulUSJ3dtaflkuEkGw7rLDoS/view?usp=sharing

 

2. My Schizophrenia: Delusional Disorder + Disorganized Thinking

2)我的精神分裂症妄想症+思維混亂

This section could also be called "The God Proof" (proof of the existence of an eternal reality, and not "your idea of what the word 'God' means"--you didn't write this, the body called "Rene Helmerichs" did), or equally, "Explaining why everyone uses the same word 'I' ".  I'll begin with your perception of me, and end with everyone's basic purpose on Earth.

這部分也可以稱為上帝的證明(永恆現實存在的證據,而不是你對上帝這個詞的含義的看法”——你沒有寫這個,名為是瑞內的身體寫了),或者同樣地,解釋為什麼每個人都使用相同的這個詞。我將從你對我的看法開始,以每個人在地球上的基本目的為結束。

I have a persistent mental illness called "Schizophrenia".  I can provide a plethora of documentation to verify this.  The illness causes me to experience (or just "perceive") a much greater intensity of fear than normal people.  But doctors also determined that I have "Delusional Disorder", so I'm unsure whether it is a real experience of fear, or just a false perception of an experience.  The outcome is the same.

我有一種叫做精神分裂症的持續性精神疾病。我可以提供大量文檔來驗證這一點。這種疾病使我經歷(或只是感知)比正常人更強烈的恐懼。但醫生也確定我患有妄想症,所以我不確定這是真實的恐懼體驗,還是只是對體驗的錯誤認知。結果是一樣的。

As a result of the heightened fear, I react.  My problem is that my reactions are not considered normal, and not at all understood.  I am currently being accused of several criminal offences.

由於恐懼加劇,我做出了反應。我的問題是我的反應不被認為是正常的,而且完全不被理解。我目前被指控犯有多項刑事罪行。

My lawyer said the court isn't willing to let me have a mental assessment because the court thinks that I didn't cooperate during the assessment on 31 May 2021.  And this is the problem!  I did cooperate!  The psychiatrist lied!  The psychiatrist said that he couldn't lawfully conduct the mental assessment because I insisted that everyone shares the same eternal God! 

我的律師說法院不願意讓我做心理評估,因為法院認為我在110531日的評估中沒有配合。這就是問題所在!我確實合作過!精神科醫生撒謊!精神科醫生說他不能合法地進行心理評估,因為我堅持每個人都有同一個永恆的上帝!

The psychiatrist didn't want to conduct the assessment!  That has nothing to do with me.  The psychiatrist had a legal obligation to conduct the assessment, and he didn't do it.  I was there, and I wanted the assessment.  Why should I have to give up my faith in order to allow the psychiatrist to conduct a mental assessment?  I can imagine how strange this must sound, but it really happened!

精神科醫生不想進行評估!那與我無關。精神科醫生有法律義務進行評估,但他沒有這樣做。我在那裡,我想要評估。為什麼我必須放棄信仰才能讓精神科醫生進行心理評估?我可以想像這聽起來有多奇怪,但它真的發生了!

Besides, even if it didn't happen exactly like that, then I am delusional, and so the question is still the same: "If the court requests a mental assessment of a delusional person, and the delusional person attends the assessment, is the psychiatrist allowed to decline the court-requested assessment if the delusional person wants to conduct the mental assessment?"

再說,就算不是那樣,那我也是妄想者,所以問題還是一樣:如果法庭要求對妄想者進行精神評估,而妄想者參加評估,是不是如果妄想者想要進行精神評估,精神科醫生是否可以拒絕法院要求的評估?

An eternal God and a psychiatric examination are very intimately related.  In order to be certain that I am not suffering from delusions, I have to maintain a very rigid belief structure, and I have to continually monitor and verify that belief structure.  At the core of my belief structure I must decided where my thinking originates.

永恆的上帝和精神科檢查密切相關。為了確定我沒有患上妄想,我必須保持一個非常嚴格的信念結構,並且我必須不斷地監控和驗證這種信念結構。在我的信念結構的核心,我必須決定我的想法起源於哪裡。

I started to solve my delusion like this:

If I am thinking, then I must need to think consistently.  But consistency applies to all of my thinking, which includes the idea of consistency.  So I must be thinking all of the time, without interruption, day and night.  Since I am not aware of all of my thinking, therefore, I must be delusional.  However, even though I am delusional, I can still recognize that a constant reality exists because the world is constantly changing.  I recognize that a singular eternal reality must exist to sustain the ever-changing universe.  Therefore, an eternal Heaven exists, wherein everyone thinks alike.  And Heaven is not Heaven unless I can also be aware of Heaven in heaven.  That means my thinking is eternal, and that I'm not aware of myself.

我開始這樣解決我的妄想:

如果我在思考,那麼我必須要始終如一地思考。但一致性適用於我所有的思考,包括一致性的想法。所以我必須一直在思考,沒有打斷,日日夜夜。由於我不知道我所有的想法,因此,我一定是妄想。但是,即使我有妄想,我仍然可以認識到存在一個不變的現實,因為世界在不斷變化。我認識到一個單一的永恆現實必須存在以維持不斷變化的宇宙。因此,存在一個永恆的天堂,每個人的想法都相同。除非我也能意識到天堂中的天堂,否則天堂不是天堂。這意味著我的思想是永恆的,而且我不知道自己。

In other words:

"I think, therefore, I am." (a famous statement by Rene Descartes).  It means: I always exist.  I originated before time began, I continue to exist independent of time, and I will continue to exist long after concept of time has ended. 

換句話說:

我思故我在。(勒內·笛卡爾的著名聲明)。意思是:我一直存在。我起源於時間開始之前,我獨立於時間繼續存在,並且在時間概念結束之後我將繼續存在。

I verify thinking as ever-lasting because I recognize the ability to think accompanies the ability of memory.  Memory means thinking bridges time, which means thinking cannot originate from, or anywhere in, a universe of time and space.  The part of me that thinks, whatever I want to call it, must exist independent and beyond concept of time. 

我認為思考是永恆的,因為我認識到思考的能力伴隨著記憶的能力。記憶意味著思維是時間的橋樑,這意味著思維不能起源於時空宇宙,也不能起源於宇宙中的任何地方。思考的我的部分,不管我想怎麼稱呼它,必須獨立存在,超越時間概念。

In the concept of self which I present to you, I am the only entity known to myself.  It follows that you are the only entity truly known to you.  "God" doesn't exist as anything separate from either of us.  So, for the sake of argument, we can call the eternally shared common part of everyone's thinking "God".

在我呈現給你們的自我概念中,我是我自己所知的唯一實體。因此,您是唯一真正為您所知的實體。上帝並不作為與我們任何人分開的任何東西而存在。因此,為了便於論證,我們可以將每個人思想中永恆共享的共同部分稱為上帝

We can't really know each other, unless we share exactly the same mind.  But, neither of us recognizes that we co-exist in the same mind, meaning that we're both questioning our own reality, we're just going about it in millions of different ways, each in our own way, for all eternity, until the separated pieces of our shared eternal mind "wake up" to understanding that there was never really any separation.  And that's what I'm experiencing right now, which psychiatrists call "disorganized thinking" (because they can't understand it: their concept of "mind" doesn't including a singular eternally shared mind).

我們不可能真正了解彼此,除非我們擁有完全相同的思想。但是,我們都沒有意識到我們共存於同一個心靈中,這意味著我們都在質疑我們自己的現實,我們只是以數百萬種不同的方式行事,每一種方式都以我們自己的方式,直到永恆,直到我們共同的永恆心靈中分離的部分醒來,以了解從來沒有真正的分離。這就是我現在所經歷的,精神病學家稱之為雜亂無章的思維(因為他們無法理解:他們的心靈概念不包括一個永遠共享的單一心靈)。

I understand thinking cannot originate in my body because God exists.  Specifically, if God exists, then I must continue to be self-aware after my body dies.  If I am self-aware after my body dies, then all of my thinking must originate in something people call "Spirit".  Spirit attaches to the body at birth and builds the body according to its desires.  Because I am Spirit, thinking cannot originate from anywhere in my body, including my brain.  An analogy can help explain this:

我明白思想不能起源於我的身體,因為上帝存在。具體來說,如果上帝存在,那麼我必須在我的身體死後繼續保持自我意識。如果我的身體死後我有自我意識,那麼我所有的思想都必須起源於人們稱之為靈性的東西。靈性在出生時就依附於身體,並根據其慾望來建造身體。因為我是靈性,思想不可能來自我身體的任何地方,包括我的大腦。一個比喻可以幫助解釋這一點:

Thinking, which originates in a non-physical reality we can call "Spirit", can use our brain like a computer program uses a computer's CPU.  The Computer CPU is basically the computer's brain.  Anyway, the computer program continues to live on and function after the whole computer dies because the maker of the computer program lives on.  The computer doesn't write its own program.  The computer can make changes to its programming according to programs which the computer programmer wrote, maintains, and allows.  When the computer dies, the programmer simply continues with a new computer.

思維起源於我們稱之為靈性的非物質現實,它可以像電腦程式使用電腦的CPU一樣使用我們的大腦。電腦CPU基本上是電腦的大腦。無論如何,電腦程式在整個電腦死亡後繼續存在並運行,因為電腦程式的製造者還活著。電腦不編寫自己的程式。電腦可以根據電腦程式員編寫、維護和允許的程序對其程式進行更改。當電腦當機時,程式員簡單地繼續使用新電腦。

In the same way, my brain and my body function exactly like a computer.

同樣,我的大腦和我的身體就像一台電腦一樣運作。

I am like the computer program in that metaphor.  My Spirit is like the computer programmer.  I am not God, but god made my Spirit, and my spirit sustains my body.  When my body dies, my spirit attaches to a new baby body (or a grown person who can talk to spirits), and my thinking continues. 

我就像那個比喻中的電腦程式。我的靈性就像電腦程式員。我不是上帝,而是上帝創造了我的靈性,我的靈性支撐著我的身體。當我的身體死亡時,我的靈魂會依附於一個新的嬰兒身體(或一個可以與靈魂交談的成年人),我的思想還在繼續。

I just keep transferring my thinking from body to body to body until, finally, all the bodies on earth are all operating according to the same basic programming, and collectively, our collective mind, decides "Well, the universe was fun to build, but it's done now because we're all thinking the same, and so we can return to the awareness of being in the limitless eternal reality of only Heaven.  The chaos of different programming on Earth was Hell, but Hell is now ended."

我只是不斷地將我的思想從一個身體轉移到另一個身體,直到最後,地球上的所有身體都按照相同的基本程序運行,並且我們的集體思想集體決定好吧,宇宙建造起來很有趣,但是現在已經完成了,因為我們都在想同樣的事情,所以我們可以回到只有天堂的無限永恆現實中的意識。地球上不同編程的混亂是地獄,但現在地獄結束了。

And that's exactly how life works.  I'm sorry that I had to explain that to you, but you need to understand that the psychiatrist, all psychiatrists, are wrong when they insist that people need pills in order to think correctly.  Psychiatrists actually have no idea where thinking comes from.  They believe it comes from the brain because they can't see Spirit and don't want to talk about Spirits!  They just keep giving people different pills to try until the patients finally say "I think I feel better now." because the patient is tired of visiting the psychiatrist!!!  Eventually the patient accepts the psychiatrist's belief that pills help people think.  Psychiatrists make people forget about the common Spiritual connection!  But, Mental Health comes from healthy spiritual thinking, from helping each other to not be confused about working together to build a sustainable environment on planet Earth!

而這正是生活的運作方式。很抱歉我不得不向你解釋,但你需要明白精神科醫生,所有的精神科醫生,當他們堅持認為人們需要藥片才能正確思考時是錯誤的。精神科醫生實際上不知道思維從何而來。他們相信它來自大腦,因為他們看不到靈性,也不想談論靈性!他們只是不斷地給人們服用不同的藥丸,直到患者最終說我覺得我現在感覺好多了。因為病人厭倦了去看心理醫生!!!最終,患者接受了精神科醫生的信念,即藥丸可以幫助人們思考。精神科醫生讓人們忘記了共同的靈性連結!但,心理健康來自健康的靈性思維,來自於互相幫助而不是對共同努力在地球上建立可持續的環境感到困惑!

 

3. Taiwan Psychiatrist Chun-Hong Lee (李俊宏) unlawfully denies court request

3)台灣精神科醫生李俊宏非法拒絕法庭請求

Here is a transcript of the exact spoken words from the psychiatrist on 31 May 2021 (I have the audio recording as well):

以下是精神科醫生在110531日的準確口述文字記錄(我也有錄音):

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1zwFsP9rRDGAsfucvXraeIIG1IqcwDusB/view?usp=sharing

On 31 May 2021, the psychiatrist literally required me to abandon my faith (and adopt his delusion that a body can think and that my thinking must stop when we die) before he was willing to complete the court-requested mental assessment.  And that is in addition to the fact that the psychiatrist also told me that a forensic psychologist (and not a psychiatrist) will conduct the actual mental assessment which the court requested.  The psychiatrist wasn't even required to conduct the assessment because, according to him, a special forensic psychologist would do it!

110531日,精神科醫生從字面上要求我在他願意完成法庭要求的心理評估之前放棄我的信仰(並接受他的錯覺,即身體可以思考,而我死後我的思考必須停止)。除此之外,精神科醫生還告訴我法院的心理學家(而不是精神科醫生)將進行法院要求的實際心理評估。甚至不需要精神科醫生進行評估,因為據他說,一位特殊的法院的心理學家會做!

So, you see, I did cooperate on 31 May 2021.  I wanted to talk to the forensic psychologist, but the psychiatrist wouldn't allow the psychologist to conduct a mental assessment unless I abandon my faith.

所以,你看,我確實在110531日進行了合作。我想和法院的心理學家談談,但除非我放棄信仰,否則精神科醫生不會讓心理學家進行心理評估。

I need the Legal Aid Foundation to explain this to my lawyer, so that my lawyer can explain this to the court, so that the judge of the court understands why the court-requested mental assessment wasn't completely on 31 May 2021.

我需要法律援助基金會向我的律師解釋這一點,以便我的律師可以向法庭解釋這一點,以便法庭法官了解為什麼法庭要求的心理評估在110531日沒有完全完成。

And then, after the court judge understands what happened on 31 May 2021, that it wasn't my fault, then the court judge can: 1. help me to receive the mental assessment, and hopefully also 2. Request an investigation into the psychiatrist.

然後,在法院法官了解110531日發生的事情後,這不是我的錯,然後法院法官可以:1)幫助我接受心理評估,希望也能2)要求對精神病醫生進行調查.

I also need to ask the Legal Aid Foundation to help me ensure that my lawyer is willing to defend my right to an assessment of mental health irrespective of his personal belief that I should remain quiet about this, and not bother the court with "thick essays" and such.  If the lawyer cannot ensure that a diagnosed Schizophrenic receives an honest assessment of mental health, is the lawyer honestly helping the victims of Schizophrenia in court? 

我還需要請求法律援助基金會幫助我確保我的律師願意捍衛我進行心理健康評估的權利,而不管他個人認為我應該對此保持沉默,不要用厚論文打擾法庭諸如此類。如果律師不能確保被診斷出的精神分裂症患者得到誠實的心理健康評估,那麼律師是否在法庭上誠實地幫助精神分裂症的受害者?

 

I am still awaiting the court to investigate evidence about three cram school managers who gave false testimony in the Civil Court lawsuit on 26 Nov 2018.  The managers are now making false accusations based on false Chinese translations of a single harmless English sentence.

我仍在等待法庭調查有關三名補習班經理在1071126日民事法庭訴訟中作偽證的證據。這些經理現在正在根據一個無害的英文句子的虛假中文翻譯做出虛假指控。

As unbelievable as all of this sounds, what I really need most of all right now is simply a mental assessment before the judge sentences me.  I really hope to hear from you soon.  And to make sure that my request is not lost (this is the "fear" part of my mental illness), I'm attaching a picture of myself with the supervisor at the Tainan City LAF.  Please forward a copy of this email to him, so that he stays informed.  And, I honestly hope he appreciates the description of life on earth, to affirm our shared faith to him!

儘管這一切聽起來令人難以置信,但我現在真正需要的只是在法官審判我之前進行心理評估。我真的希望很快能收到你的來信。為了確保我的請求不會丟失(這是我精神疾病的恐懼部分),我附上了一張我與台南市LAF主管的照片。請將此電子郵件的副本轉發給他,以便他隨時了解情況。並且,我真誠地希望他欣賞對地球生命的描述,肯定我們共同信仰!

 

Rene Helmerichs

(中華民國:是瑞內)

19 June 2021

 

4. Attachments:

4附件:

IMG_20200910_105725.jpg


Picture taken 10 Sept 2020, Legal Aid Foundation, Tainan City, Taiwan

圖片拍攝於109910日,台灣台南市法律援助基金會

20181016 pet pic4.jpg


The picture was taken 14 Aug 2017 during the Kidsland Sesame Street overnight school trip, somewhere in Taiwan.  The picture was included in a flier and printed on 15 Oct 2018.  The small English print (translation of the Chinese) reads:

這張照片拍攝於106814日,在台灣某處的Kidsland芝麻街過夜學校旅行期間。該圖片包含在傳單中並於1071015日印刷。英文小字(中文翻譯)如下:They spent a night alone in a hotel with a teacher...

...the school knew the teacher spent years in a mental hospital...

the school hides his past...

Um.

The Canada police suspected the teacher of making bombs

The Republic Of China Legal Aid Foundation says the teacher was in jail for 3 years for ...

"sexual embarrassment" charges...

Um.

This really happened at Sesame Street School in Taiwan.

Should we tell the parents just half the story?

tlaf0001_QR_20210619.png


 

Next page0007, Welcoming Kidsland Sesame Street:

http://p7.rene.guru

====

#rene.guru

End of page.  Comment on the Main Page:

http://p1.rene.guru

Journal Of A Schizophrenic, with a twist.

Civil Lawsuit against three Taiwan Criminal Court Judges

我今天起訴了台灣刑事法院的三位法官。 _zhou0001 | dated 28 July 2021, by Rene Helmerichs PDF: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1sXAFBnYGTcy9SYW65ExId-b6Gn9O55BV...